Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34743221›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of biometeorology2022

Wearable ultraviolet radiation sensors for research and personal use.

Alyssa Henning, Nathan J Downs, Jennifer K Vanos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of biometeorology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. RayWatch: Hemispherical Diffusion on Wrist UV Sensor for Indoor-Outdoor Sensing.... International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks. International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Stratospheric ozone, UV radiation, and climate interactions.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Objectively-Assessed Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure and Sunburn Occurrence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alyssa HenningSchool for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Nathan J DownsSchool of Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3191-6404
Jennifer K VanosSchool of Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia. jvanos@asu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1854-9096
University of Southern Queensland · AUArizona State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancers are strongly linked to personal exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, yet UV exposure is also the most preventable risk factor. People are exposed to UV rays when they engage in outdoor activities, particularly exercise, which is an important health behavior. Thus, researchers and the general public have shown increasing interest in measuring UV exposure using wearable sensors during outdoor physical activity. However, minimal research exists at the intersection of UV sensors, personal exposure, adaptive behavior due to exposures, and risk of skin damage. Recent years have seen an influx of new consumer-based and research-based UV-sensing technologies with wide-ranging form factors and purposes to fill this research gap, yet a thorough review of available sensors for specific purposes does not exist. Hence, the overall goal of this state-of-the-art review is to synthesize the current academic and gray literature surrounding personal UV-sensing technologies. Peer-reviewed journal articles and "gray literature," such as working papers, manuals, and UV sensor websites, were reviewed, assessing attributes of UV wearables marketed for research use, personal use, or both. Overall, 13 wearable UV sensors are available for personal use and/or research applications. These sensors vary from electronic to photochromic, with large differences in price, data outputs, accuracy, and precision. Recommendations are provided for which sensors are most suitable for various types of research or public use. Notably, the review findings will help guide researchers in future studies assessing UV exposure during physical activity.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysWearable Electronic DevicesExerciseHumansDosimeterPhysical activitySkin cancerSun-protective practicesUltraviolet radiationWearable technology

Identifiers

PMID34743221
OpenAlexW3211828200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.