Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34742971›Full record

ReviewThe Science of the total environment2022

Sorption, separation and recycling of ammonium in agricultural soils: A viable application for magnetic biochar?

Max D Gillingham, Rachel L Gomes, Rebecca Ferrari, Helen M West

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Micro- and Macroelements Content of Plants Used for Landfill Leachate Treatment Based onInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Max D GillinghamFaculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: max.gillingham@nottingham.ac.uk.
Rachel L GomesFaculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Rebecca FerrariFaculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Helen M WestSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research on the magnetisation of biochar, a carbon-based material that can be used as a sorbent, has opened novel opportunities in the field of environmental remediation, as incorporating magnetic particles into biochar can simplify subsequent separation. This could offer a sustainable circular economy-based solution in two areas of waste management; firstly, pyrolysis of agricultural waste for magnetic biochar synthesis could reduce greenhouse gas emissions derived from traditional agricultural waste processing, such as landfill and incineration, while secondly, application of magnetic biochar to remove excess nitrogen from soils (made possible through magnetic separation) could provide opportunities for this pollutant to be used as a recycled fertiliser. While sorption of pollutants by magnetic biochar has been researched in wastewater, few studies have investigated magnetic biochar use in polluted soils. Nitrogen pollution (e.g. NH

Indexed as

Ammonium CompoundsSoil PollutantsCharcoalEcosystemMagnetic PhenomenaSoilAmmonium CompoundsbiocharCharcoalSoilSoil PollutantsCircular economyMagnetic biocharNitrogen sorptionPollutionRecyclingRemediation

Identifiers

PMID34742971
PMCPMC8811483
OpenAlexW3214635139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.