Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34742909›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2022

Self-reported emotional eaters consume more food under stress if they experience heightened stress reactivity and emotional relief from stress upon eating.

Rebecca R Klatzkin, Laurence J Nolan, Harry R Kissileff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Emotional Eating and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the Police Force: The Carolina Blue Project.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca R KlatzkinRhodes College, Department of Psychology, 2000 North Parkway, Memphis, TN 38104, USA. Electronic address: klatzkinr@rhodes.edu.
Laurence J NolanWagner College, Department of Psychology, 1 Campus Rd., Staten Island, NY 10301, USA. Electronic address: lnolan@wagner.edu.
Harry R KissileffDiabetes, Obesity, and Metabolism Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai Morningside Hospital, 1111 Amsterdam Ave. New York, NY 10025, USA. Electronic address: Harry.Kissileff2@mountsinai.org.
Rhodes College · USWagner College · US

Funding

Mechanisms Underlying Predictors of Success from Obesity SurgeryR01DK108643 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KISSILEFF, HARRY R · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK108643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group data means from individuals who self-assess as emotional eaters do not reliably show increased food intake in response to stress or negative emotions. This inconsistency in predictive validity of self-reported emotional eating (EE) could be attributable to unconsidered moderation of the relationship between self-reported EE and behavioral measures of EE. Greater emotional relief from stress by eating may provide enhanced negative reinforcement and promote future EE in response to stress as a form of self-medication. Thus, we predicted that greater emotional relief from stress by eating (decrease in negative affect from stress to post-eating) would moderate the extent to which heightened stress reactivity (measured by systolic blood pressure, SBP) moderates the relationship between self-reported EE and food intake post-stress. We also hypothesized that self-reported EE would not predict greater food consumption on the rest day. 43 undergraduate women completed online assessments of eating behaviors. Participants were given snacks to eat after a mental stress task (TSST) or rest period on separate days in counterbalanced order. Our prediction was supported, as the moderated moderation model (PROCESS model 3) was highly significant on the stress day. Self-reported EE predicted increased food intake post-stress only under conditions of high stress reactivity and high emotional relief. On the rest day, self-reported EE predicted greater snack food intake only when SBP was high. This conditional increased intake substantiates stress as a promoter of snack food consumption for women with greater EE. Overall, our findings identified factors that may distinguish the subset of self-reported emotional eaters who are more likely to display EE behaviors in a laboratory setting, yet further studies are needed to directly test whether negative reinforcement via emotional relief from stress by eating drives enhanced EE following stress.

Indexed as

EmotionsFeeding BehaviorEatingFemaleHumansSelf ReportSnacksStress, PsychologicalEmotional eatingEmotional reliefFood intakeNegative affectStress

Identifiers

PMID34742909
PMCPMC8717738
OpenAlexW3209239593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.