Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34742354›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2021

Building a culture of engagement at a research centre for childhood disability.

Kinga Pozniak, Francine Buchanan, Andrea Cross, Jennifer Crowson, Barb Galuppi, Danijela Grahovac, Jan Willem Gorter, Oksana Hlyva, Marjolijn Ketelaar, Olaf Kraus de Camargo and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quality of life surveys developed or validated in children or youth with special healthcare needs: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Developing an Inclusive Dance Guide for Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Co-Design Process and Initial Feasibility Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advancing a collective vision for equity-based cocreation through prototyping at an international forum.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Global qualitative nursing research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Kinga PozniakCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. pozniakk@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7954-9351
Francine BuchananCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Andrea CrossCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Jennifer CrowsonCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Barb GaluppiCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Danijela GrahovacCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Jan Willem GorterCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Oksana HlyvaCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Marjolijn KetelaarCenter of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Olaf Kraus de CamargoCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Manda Krpan MesicCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Rachel MartensCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Dayle McCauleyCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Linda NguyenCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Robert J PalisanoCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Michelle PhoenixCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Connie PuttermanCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Peter RosenbaumCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Jennifer SprungCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Sonya StrohmCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Rachel TeplickyCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Donna ThomsonCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Marilyn WrightCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngaging patients and family members as partners in research studies has become a widespread practice in healthcare. However, relatively little has been documented about what happens after the research study ends. For example, is patient and family engagement embedded in the wider infrastructure of organizations, and if so how? What are the long-term effects of engaging parents on research teams on the culture of how research is conducted? This study seeks to address these two gaps by examining how a culture of family engagement has been built over time at CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada.

methodsThis study is based on ethnographic research methodology and combines elements of organizational ethnography, interviews, and collaborative auto-ethnography with parent partners, researchers, staff, and trainees.

resultsSince the inception of CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research at McMaster University in 1989, parents have been involved in research studies. Over time, this involvement evolved from being consulted on research studies to undertaking decision-making roles as partners and most recently as co-principal investigators. A growing infrastructure fosters a community of engagement that goes beyond the individual research study, and often beyond CanChild. This infrastructure consists of training, knowledge mobilization and social networking. In addition, the "softer" building blocks of CanChild's culture of engagement are an openness to learning from others, a commitment to relationship building, and a drive to grow and improve. These values are espoused by the leadership and are instilled in the next generation of researchers to inform both research and clinical work. While some challenges should be acknowledged when researchers and family partners work together on research studies, we identify a number of strategies that we have used in our studies to foster authentic and meaningful family-researcher partnerships.

conclusionEngaging patients and families as partners in research constitutes a culture shift in health research, whereby studies about patients and families are carried out with them. Developing a community of engagement that transcends an individual research study is a step towards creating a culture of research that is truly shaped by the people about whom the research is being done.

Indexed as

Childhood disabilityCollaborative auto-ethnographyFamily engagement in researchOrganizational ethnography

Identifiers

PMID34742354
PMCPMC8572501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.