Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34742327›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

PRagMatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced vs nOrmaL Saline FlUid in Sepsis: study protocol for the PRoMPT BOLUS randomized interventional trial.

Scott L Weiss, Fran Balamuth, Elliot Long, Graham C Thompson, Katie L Hayes, Hannah Katcoff, Marlena Cook, Elena Tsemberis, Christopher P Hickey, Amanda Williams and 9 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04102371 (Pragmatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced Versus Normal Saline Fluid in Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04102371 phase3completednot on this map

Pragmatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced Versus Normal Saline Fluid in Sepsis

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaRan2020 to 2026Enrolled9,041ConditionsShock, SepticArmsLactated Ringer, Normal Saline, Plasma-lyte
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Time Course of Kidney Injury Biomarkers in Children With Septic Shock: Nested Cohort Study Within the Pragmatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced Versus Normal Saline Fluid in Sepsis Trial.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Preventing pediatric acute kidney injury: is it even possible?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. PRoMPTing Practice Change in Pediatric Sepsis: Is There a Role for Acute Kidney Injury Biomarkers in Early Fluid Resuscitation?Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Can an individual be enrolled in more than one clinical trial using exception from informed consent?Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Scott L WeissDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. WeissS@chop.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7040-3281
Fran BalamuthThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Pediatric Sepsis Program, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elliot LongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Graham C ThompsonDepartments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Katie L HayesThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Pediatric Sepsis Program, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hannah KatcoffDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Data Science and Biostatistics Unit, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Marlena CookDepartment of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elena TsemberisDepartment of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christopher P HickeyThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Pediatric Sepsis Program, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Amanda WilliamsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah Williamson-UrquhartDepartments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Meredith L BorlandDivisions of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Perth Children's Hospital, School of Medicine at the University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Stuart R DalzielDepartments of Surgery and Pediatrics: Child and Youth Health, Starship Children's Hospital, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ben GelbartDepartments of Pediatrics and Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Stephen B FreedmanSections of Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Gastroenterology, Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Franz E BablDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jing HuangDepartment of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nathan KuppermannDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, UC Davis School of medicine and UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Pragmatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced Versus Normal Saline Fluid in Sepsis (PRoMPT BOLUS) Investigators of the PECARN, PERC, and PREDICT Networks
UC Davis Health · USUniversity of Calgary · CAChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USRoyal Children's Hospital · AUUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Auckland · NZMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

PROMPT BOLUS admin supplementR01HD101528 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI BALAMUTH, FRANCES B, WEISS, SCOTT L · 2020 to 2024
$4.8M
CIHR 173498Department of Public Health, Pennsylvania SAP #4100085749Medical Research Futures Fund International Clinical Trial Collaboration APP1190814National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD101528NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD101528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsDespite evidence that preferential use of balanced/buffered fluids may improve outcomes compared with chloride-rich 0.9% saline, saline remains the most commonly used fluid for children with septic shock. We aim to determine if resuscitation with balanced/buffered fluids as part of usual care will improve outcomes, in part through reduced kidney injury and without an increase in adverse effects, compared to 0.9% saline for children with septic shock.

methodsThe Pragmatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced versus Normal Saline Fluid in Sepsis (PRoMPT BOLUS) study is an international, open-label pragmatic interventional trial being conducted at > 40 sites in the USA, Canada, and Australia/New Zealand starting on August 25, 2020, and continuing for 5 years. Children > 6 months to < 18 years treated for suspected septic shock with abnormal perfusion in an emergency department will be randomized to receive either balanced/buffered crystalloids (intervention) or 0.9% saline (control) for initial resuscitation and maintenance fluids for up to 48 h. Eligible patients are enrolled and randomized using serially numbered, opaque envelopes concurrent with clinical care. Given the life-threatening nature of septic shock and narrow therapeutic window to start fluid resuscitation, patients may be enrolled under "exception from informed consent" in the USA or "deferred consent" in Canada and Australia/New Zealand. Other than fluid type, all decisions about timing, volume, and rate of fluid administration remain at the discretion of the treating clinicians. For pragmatic reasons, clinicians will not be blinded to study fluid type. Anticipated enrollment is 8800 patients. The primary outcome will be major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE30), a composite of death, renal replacement therapy, and persistent kidney dysfunction. Additional effectiveness, safety, and biologic outcomes will also be analyzed. DISCUSSION: PRoMPT BOLUS will provide high-quality evidence for the comparative effectiveness of buffered/balanced crystalloids versus 0.9% saline for the initial fluid management of children with suspected septic shock in emergency settings.

trial registrationPRoMPT BOLUS was first registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04102371 ) on September 25, 2019. Enrollment started on August 25, 2020.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticChildCrystalloid SolutionsFluid TherapyHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSaline SolutionCrystalloid SolutionsSaline SolutionCrystalloidIntravenous fluidPediatricPragmatic trialRenal failureSalineSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID34742327
PMCPMC8572061
OpenAlexW3211417714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.