Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34742302›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2021

Improving assessment of acute obstetric patients - introducing a Swedish obstetric triage system.

Linnéa Lindroos, Radha Korsoski, Marie Ordéus Öhman, Helen Elden, Ove Karlsson, Verena Sengpiel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linnéa LindroosDepartment of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Diagnosvägen 15, Paviljong 7b, 416 50, Gothenburg, Sweden. linnea.lindroos@vgregion.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2593-1349
Radha KorsoskiDepartment of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Diagnosvägen 15, Paviljong 7b, 416 50, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Marie Ordéus ÖhmanDepartment of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Diagnosvägen 15, Paviljong 7b, 416 50, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Helen EldenDepartment of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Diagnosvägen 15, Paviljong 7b, 416 50, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ove KarlssonNU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden.
Verena SengpielDepartment of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Diagnosvägen 15, Paviljong 7b, 416 50, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SENU Hospital Group · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFailure to identify severely ill obstetric patients seeking acute care, and hence delaying treatment, can lead to maternal morbidity and mortality. Triage is the prioritization of patients seeking emergency care, based on clinical decision-making tools assessing medical urgency. While triage has been applied in general emergency medicine for 30 years, there are only a few obstetric triage systems (OTS) and obstetric triage has hitherto been unknown in Sweden. Obstetric triage is more complex than general triage since both mother and fetus require assessment, and pregnancy-related physiological changes must be taken into account. This paper aims to describe the development and an initial evaluation of the first OTS in Sweden.

methodsA multidisciplinary team surveyed reasons to seek acute obstetric care and the current patient flow at the largest obstetric unit in Scandinavia, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, with about 10,000 deliveries/year. A semi-structured literature review on obstetric triage was undertaken. Based on the survey and the literature review the first Swedish OTS was developed and implemented. Patient satisfaction was followed by electronical questionnaires. Initial validity evaluation was performed, defined by the system's ability to identify patients with need for hospital admission, stratified by acuity level.

resultsThe Gothenburg Obstetrical Triage System (GOTS) addresses the patient to one of five acuity levels based on both vital signs and 14 chief complaint algorithms. It entails recommendations for initial procedures of care as well as an acuity form for documentation. Initial evaluation of the system indicates good correlation between need for admission and acuity level. The implementation has provided the staff with an improved medical overview of the patients and patient flow and enabled the unit to monitor emergency care in a structured way. Implementation came along with increased patient and staff satisfaction.

conclusionThe GOTS is the first OTS developed in and for Sweden and implementation has improved management of obstetric patients seeking acute care. Patients are now prioritized according to level of acuity and the time to assessment and treatment of severely ill patients can be structurally evaluated. Both patients and staff express improved satisfaction with obstetric triage.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesObstetricsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansPregnancySwedenTriageEmergency medicineObstetricsPregnancyQuality improvementTriage

Identifiers

PMID34742302
PMCPMC8572438
OpenAlexW3213374448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.