Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34742252›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2021

Real-world evidence data on the monoclonal antibody erenumab in migraine prevention: perspectives of treating physicians in Germany.

Andreas Straube, Philipp Stude, Charly Gaul, Katrin Schuh, Mirja Koch

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas StraubeDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital LMU, Ludwig-Maximillians-University, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Philipp StudeNeurological Practice Dr. Stude, Bochum, Germany.
Charly GaulHeadache Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt a. Main, Germany.
Katrin SchuhClinical Research Neuroscience, Novartis Pharma GmbH, Roonstrasse 25, 90429, Nürnberg, Germany. Katrin.Schuh@novartis.com.
Mirja KochGlobal Medical Affairs Neuroscience, Novartis Pharma AG, Fabrikstrasse 2, 4056, Basel, Switzerland. Mirja.Koch@novartis.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7152-6227
Cardiovascular Center Frankfurt · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DENovartis (Germany) · DENovartis (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

novartis pharma novartis pharma
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundErenumab, the first-in-class fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, was shown to be efficacious and safe for the prophylactic treatment of migraine in adults in randomized clinical trials. Large-scale, real-world evidence in multi-centre settings is still needed to confirm these results. Erenumab patient profiles outside clinical trials and physicians' treatment patterns, as well as data from patients treated in Germany, a severely impacted population, are not published yet.

methodsTELESCOPE was a multi-centre survey gathering real-world data from 45 German headache centres between July 2019 and December 2019. The project consisted of two parts. In the first part, treating physicians shared their experiences on current erenumab treatment with regard to patient profiles, treatment patterns and treatment responses. In the second part, a retrospective chart review was conducted of 542 migraine patients treated with erenumab for at least three months. Treatment responses focused on various aspects of patients' quality of life.

resultsThe analysis of 542 patients' charts revealed that three-month treatment with erenumab significantly reduced monthly headaches, migraine and acute medication days. Furthermore, headache intensity and frequency were reduced in over 75 % and accompanying aura in 35 % of patients. The clinical global impression scale revealed a general improvement in 91 % of patients. According to the treating physicians' professional judgement, 83 % of patients responded to erenumab and 80 % were satisfied with the treatment. Physicians evaluated restricted quality of life, the number of monthly migraine days and previous, prophylactic treatments as the main components of the current patient profile for monoclonal antibody recipients. Based on the assessment of physicians, erenumab reduced migraine symptoms in 65 % and increased quality of life in more than 75 % of their patients.

conclusionsTELESCOPE confirms positive treatment responses with erenumab shown in clinical trials in a real-world multi-centre setting. The results show consistently positive experiences of physicians utilizing erenumab in clinical practice and underline that therapy with this monoclonal antibody is effective in migraine patients, particular in those, who have failed several prophylactic therapies.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersPhysiciansAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsGermanyHumansQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistserenumabErenumabMigraineProphylactic treatmentReal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID34742252
PMCPMC8572451
OpenAlexW3176179751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.