Observational studyEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2021
Predictors of poor seroconversion and adverse events to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in cancer patients on active treatment.
Observational study in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04932863 (A Prospective Observational Non Interventional Study of Reactogenicity and Safety of the BNT162b2 Messenger Ribonucleic Acid), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Observational Non Interventional Study of Reactogenicity and Safety of the BNT162b2 Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) Covid-19 Vaccine in Cancer Patients on Active Treatment
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Impaired serological response to COVID-19 vaccination following anticancer therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of medical virology · 2022Pooled it
- Predictors of poor serologic response to COVID-19 vaccine in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2022Pooled it
- Booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines for patients with haematological and solid cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2022Pooled it
- COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Malignancy; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- SARS-CoV2 and Anti-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Is There a Plausible Mechanistic Link with Cancer?Cancers · 2025Review
- Delayed but successful development of immune memory against SARS-COV-2 after B cell-depleting monotherapy.Infection · 2025Observational
- Review
- Impact of systemic anticancer therapy timing on cancer vaccine immunogenicity: a review.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
- Effect of Distress, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms on SARS-CoV-2 mRNA BNT162b2 Vaccine Efficacy in Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2024Article
- Time-Dependent Effects of Clinical Interventions on SARS-CoV-2 Immunity in Patients with Lung Cancer.Vaccines · 2024Article
- Immunogenicity after vaccination of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer: a prospective, single center, observational study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Observational
- Article
- Attitudes towards and safety of the SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccines in 188 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a post-vaccination cross-sectional survey.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Article
- Serological Response to SARS-CoV-2 after COVID-19 Vaccination in Lung Cancer Patients: Short Review.Vaccines · 2023Review
- Review
- Longitudinal efficacy and toxicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.Cell death & disease · 2023Article
- Immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccine in lung cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment: A prospective multicenter cohort study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Efficacy and impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on cancer treatment for breast cancer patients: a multi-center prospective observational study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Observational
- Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the gastrointestinal oncology setting: An overview.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInitial findings in patients with cancer suggest a lower seroconversion to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination possibly related to myelo-immunosuppressive therapies. We conducted a prospective study to assess factors predicting poor seroconversion and adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) to the BNT162b2 vaccine in patients on active treatment. PATIENTS AND
methodsCancer patients, candidates to two doses of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, were enrolled. Patients on active surveillance served as controls. The primary endpoint was poor seroconversion (anti S1/S2 IgG < 25 AU/mL) after 21 days from the second dose.
resultsBetween March and July 2021, 320 subjects were recruited, and 291 were assessable. The lack of seroconversion at 21 days from the second dose was 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4-8.7) on active surveillance, 13.9% (8.2-21.6) on chemotherapy, 11.4% (5.1-21.3) on hormone therapy, 21.7% (7.5-43.7) on targeted therapy and 4.8% (0.12-23.8) on immune-checkpoint-inhibitors (ICI). Compared to controls, the risk of no IgG response was greater for chemotherapy (p = 0.033), targeted therapy (0.005) and hormonotherapy (p = 0.051). Lymphocyte count < 1 × 10
conclusionChemotherapy, targeted therapy, hormone therapy, lymphocyte count < 1 × 10 GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04932863.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.