Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34742100›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2021

Reassessing associations between white matter and behaviour with multimodal microstructural imaging.

Alberto Lazari, Piergiorgio Salvan, Michiel Cottaar, Daniel Papp, Olof Jens van der Werf, Ainslie Johnstone, Zeena-Britt Sanders, Cassandra Sampaio-Baptista, Nicole Eichert, Kentaro Miyamoto and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Alberto LazariWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nu_eld Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK. Electronic address: alberto.lazari@univ.ox.ac.uk.
Piergiorgio SalvanWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nu_eld Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Michiel CottaarWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nu_eld Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Daniel PappWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nu_eld Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Olof Jens van der WerfSection Brain Stimulation and Cognition, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre (MBIC), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Ainslie JohnstoneWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nu_eld Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK.
Zeena-Britt SandersWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nu_eld Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Cassandra Sampaio-BaptistaWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nu_eld Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Nicole EichertWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nu_eld Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Kentaro MiyamotoWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK.
Anderson WinklerNational Institute of Mental Health, National of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Martina F CallaghanWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.
Thomas E NicholsOxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nu_eld Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Charlotte J StaggWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nu_eld Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK; Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK; MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Matthew F S RushworthWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK.
Lennart VerhagenWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Heidi Johansen-BergWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nu_eld Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK. Electronic address: heidi.johansen-berg@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 102584/Z/13/ZWellcome Trust 109062/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 110027/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have established specific relationships between White Matter (WM) and behaviour. However, these studies have typically focussed on fractional anisotropy (FA), a neuroimaging metric that is sensitive to multiple tissue properties, making it difficult to identify what biological aspects of WM may drive such relationships. Here, we carry out a pre-registered assessment of WM-behaviour relationships in 50 healthy individuals across multiple behavioural and anatomical domains, and complementing FA with myelin-sensitive quantitative MR modalities (MT, R1, R2∗). Surprisingly, we only find support for predicted relationships between FA and behaviour in one of three pre-registered tests. For one behavioural domain, where we failed to detect an FA-behaviour correlation, we instead find evidence for a correlation between behaviour and R1. This hints that multimodal approaches are able to identify a wider range of WM-behaviour relationships than focusing on FA alone. To test whether a common biological substrate such as myelin underlies WM-behaviour relationships, we then ran joint multimodal analyses, combining across all MRI parameters considered. No significant multimodal signatures were found and power analyses suggested that sample sizes of 40-200 may be required to detect such joint multimodal effects, depending on the task being considered. These results demonstrate that FA-behaviour relationships from the literature can be replicated, but may not be easily generalisable across domains. Instead, multimodal microstructural imaging may be best placed to detect a wider range of WM-behaviour relationships, as different MRI modalities provide distinct biological sensitivities. Our findings highlight a broad heterogeneity in WM's relationship with behaviour, suggesting that variable biological effects may be shaping their interaction.

Indexed as

White MatterAnisotropyBrainDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBimanual coordinationCognitive controlMicrostructural imagingMultimodal imagingMyelinWhite matter

Identifiers

PMID34742100
PMCPMC8940642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.