ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2022
Comparing automated vs. manual data collection for COVID-specific medications from electronic health records.
Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of a novel semi-automated dataset for large-scale surveillance of central venous catheter-related mechanical complications.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026Article
- A method to enable clinical and translational research teams with custom real-world data from electronic health record systems.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of privacy-preserving large language models for automated echocardiography report analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Mapping patient encounters to identify recruitment timepoints after brain tumour surgery: a cohort and cross-sectional study.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Preparing for future pandemics: Automated intensive care electronic health record data extraction to accelerate clinical insights.Journal of intensive medicine · 2025Article
- Large language models for data extraction from unstructured and semi-structured electronic health records: a multiple model performance evaluation.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Discrepancies in Aggregate Patient Data between Two Sources with Data Originating from the Same Electronic Health Record: A Case Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Data Management 101 for drug developers: A peek behind the curtain.Clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- Validation of automated data abstraction for SCCM discovery VIRUS COVID-19 registry: practical EHR export pathways (VIRUS-PEEP).Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Research on primary Sjögren's syndrome in 2004-2021: a Web of Science-based cross-sectional bibliometric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2022Article
- Inaccurate recording of routinely collected data items influences identification of COVID-19 patients.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Article
- Efficient and Reliable Data Extraction in Radiation Oncology using Python Programming Language: A Pilot Study.Journal of medical physicsArticle
- Characterizing drug-induced stuttering in electronic health records.Journal of communication disordersArticle
- Comparison of Diagnosis Codes to Clinical Notes in Classifying Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionData extraction from electronic health record (EHR) systems occurs through manual abstraction, automated extraction, or a combination of both. While each method has its strengths and weaknesses, both are necessary for retrospective observational research as well as sudden clinical events, like the COVID-19 pandemic. Assessing the strengths, weaknesses, and potentials of these methods is important to continue to understand optimal approaches to extracting clinical data. We set out to assess automated and manual techniques for collecting medication use data in patients with COVID-19 to inform future observational studies that extract data from the electronic health record (EHR). MATERIALS AND
methodsFor 4,123 COVID-positive patients hospitalized and/or seen in the emergency department at an academic medical center between 03/03/2020 and 05/15/2020, we compared medication use data of 25 medications or drug classes collected through manual abstraction and automated extraction from the EHR. Quantitatively, we assessed concordance using Cohen's kappa to measure interrater reliability, and qualitatively, we audited observed discrepancies to determine causes of inconsistencies.
resultsFor the 16 inpatient medications, 11 (69%) demonstrated moderate or better agreement; 7 of those demonstrated strong or almost perfect agreement. For 9 outpatient medications, 3 (33%) demonstrated moderate agreement, but none achieved strong or almost perfect agreement. We audited 12% of all discrepancies (716/5,790) and, in those audited, observed three principal categories of error: human error in manual abstraction (26%), errors in the extract-transform-load (ETL) or mapping of the automated extraction (41%), and abstraction-query mismatch (33%).
conclusionOur findings suggest many inpatient medications can be collected reliably through automated extraction, especially when abstraction instructions are designed with data architecture in mind. We discuss quality issues, concerns, and improvements for institutions to consider when crafting an approach. During crises, institutions must decide how to allocate limited resources. We show that automated extraction of medications is feasible and make recommendations on how to improve future iterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.