Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34741788›Full record

ArticleAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2022

Automated assessment of Ki-67 proliferation index in neuroendocrine tumors by deep learning.

Tiina Vesterinen, Jenni Säilä, Sami Blom, Mirkka Pennanen, Helena Leijon, Johanna Arola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Automated assessment of Ki-67 proliferation index in neuroendocrine tumors by deep learning.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tiina VesterinenDepartment of Pathology, HUS Diagnostic Center, HUSLAB, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jenni SäiläInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Sami BlomAiforia Technologies Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
Mirkka PennanenDepartment of Pathology, HUS Diagnostic Center, HUSLAB, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Helena LeijonDepartment of Pathology, HUS Diagnostic Center, HUSLAB, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Johanna ArolaDepartment of Pathology, HUS Diagnostic Center, HUSLAB, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) is a prognostic factor in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and defines tumor grade. Analysis of Ki-67 PI requires calculation of Ki-67-positive and Ki-67-negative tumor cells, which is highly subjective. To overcome this, we developed a deep learning-based Ki-67 PI algorithm (KAI) that objectively calculates Ki-67 PI. Our study material consisted of NETs divided into training (n = 39), testing (n = 124), and validation (n = 60) series. All slides were digitized and processed in the Aiforia

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAlgorithmsAutomationCell ProliferationDeep LearningDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFinlandHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKi-67 AntigenNeuroendocrine TumorsPathology, ClinicalReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 Antigendeep learningdigital pathologyKi-67 proliferation indexneuroendocrine neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID34741788
PMCPMC9299468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.