Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34741729›Full record

SynthesisCurrent osteoporosis reports2021

Augmenting Osteoporosis Imaging with Machine Learning.

Valentina Pedoia, Francesco Caliva, Galateia Kazakia, Andrew J Burghardt, Sharmila Majumdar

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current osteoporosis reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valentina PedoiaDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1700 Fourth Street, Suite 201, QB3 Building, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. valentian.pedoia@ucsf.edu.
Francesco CalivaDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1700 Fourth Street, Suite 201, QB3 Building, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Galateia KazakiaDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1700 Fourth Street, Suite 201, QB3 Building, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Andrew J BurghardtDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1700 Fourth Street, Suite 201, QB3 Building, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Sharmila MajumdarDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1700 Fourth Street, Suite 201, QB3 Building, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn this paper, we discuss how recent advancements in image processing and machine learning (ML) are shaping a new and exciting era for the osteoporosis imaging field. With this paper, we want to give the reader a basic exposure to the ML concepts that are necessary to build effective solutions for image processing and interpretation, while presenting an overview of the state of the art in the application of machine learning techniques for the assessment of bone structure, osteoporosis diagnosis, fracture detection, and risk prediction. RECENT

findingsML effort in the osteoporosis imaging field is largely characterized by "low-cost" bone quality estimation and osteoporosis diagnosis, fracture detection, and risk prediction, but also automatized and standardized large-scale data analysis and data-driven imaging biomarker discovery. Our effort is not intended to be a systematic review, but an opportunity to review key studies in the recent osteoporosis imaging research landscape with the ultimate goal of discussing specific design choices, giving the reader pointers to possible solutions of regression, segmentation, and classification tasks as well as discussing common mistakes.

Indexed as

Machine LearningBone DensityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesRisk FactorsDiagnosisFracture detectionImagingMachine learningOsteoporosisRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID34741729
OpenAlexW3212925550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.