ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2022
Factors associated with the comprehensive needs of caregivers of childhood cancer survivors in Korea.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Journey with paediatric cancer: reflections on its impact on patients and their families.The Pan African medical journal · 2026Article
- Risk factors associated with the comprehensive needs of cancer caregivers in China.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Mental health outcomes in parents of children with a cancer diagnosis in Sweden: A nationwide cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Needs Assessment in Parents of Children Affected by Cancer: A Qualitative Perspective.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCaregivers of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) have diverse needs, which should be addressed to provide comprehensive cancer care. We aimed to evaluate the unmet needs of caregivers of CCS.
methodsThe subjects were 700 caregivers recruited at three major hospitals in South Korea. We collected study data using self-administered questionnaires and a thorough review of medical records. We assessed the unmet needs of caregivers using the comprehensive needs assessment tool for cancer caregivers and evaluated factors associated with the highest tertile range of unmet needs by multiple logistic regression analysis.
resultsThe greatest unmet needs of caregivers had to do with healthcare staff, followed by information. Compared with father-caregivers, mother-caregivers had greater unmet needs related to health and psychological problems, family/social support, and religious/spiritual support, with odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 3.79 (2.52-5.69), 3.17 (2.09-4.81), and 1.69 (1.14-2.50), respectively. Compared with caregivers of the youngest CCS (< 6 years), caregivers of CCS aged 12-18 years and caregivers of the oldest CCS (≥ 19 years) respectively showed 2.62 (1.24-5.52) and 3.18 (1.34-7.55) times greater unmet needs for information. Caregivers of CCS who received haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation had a 2.01-fold (1.14-3.57) greater need for practical support.
conclusionCaregivers of CCS had substantial unmet needs required for comprehensive care for CCS. Several individual characteristics of caregivers and their children were significantly associated with greater unmet needs of the caregivers. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Personalized support based on the characteristics of both CCS and their caregivers is required to provide comprehensive care for CCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.