Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34741625›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

Center of pressure (COP) measurement in patients with confirmed successful outcomes following shoulder surgery show significant sensorimotor deficits.

Yannick J Ehmann, Daniel P Berthold, Sven Reuter, Knut Beitzel, Robin Köhler, Fabian Stöcker, Lukas N Muench, Jonas Pogorzelski, Marco-Christopher Rupp, Sepp Braun and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Yannick J EhmannDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Daniel P BertholdDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Sven ReuterDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Knut BeitzelDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Robin KöhlerDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Fabian StöckerDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, TU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lukas N MuenchDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Jonas PogorzelskiDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Marco-Christopher RuppDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Sepp BraunDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Andreas B ImhoffDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. imhoff@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-6446
Stefan BuchmannDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEAtos (France) · FRInstitute for Sports Medicine · DEStuttgart Technical University of Applied Sciences · DEUMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik · ATZNA Middelheim Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the sensorimotor and clinical function of patients with confirmed successful outcome after either undergoing acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilization, Bankart repair (BR), or rotator cuff repair (RC), and to compare these measures to the contralateral, healthy side without history of previous injuries or surgeries of the upper extremity. It was hypothesized that patients of each interventional group would have inferior sensorimotor function of the shoulder joint compared to the contralateral, healthy side, while presenting with successful clinical and functional outcomes.

methodsThree intervention groups including ten patients who had confirmed successful clinical and functional outcomes after either undergoing ACJ stabilization, BR, or RC were evaluated postoperatively at an average follow-up of 31.7 ± 11.6 months. Additionally, a healthy control group (CG) of ten patients was included. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley (CM) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score. Pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Sensorimotor function was assessed by determining the center of pressure (COP) of the shoulder joint in a one-handed support task in supine position on a validated pressure plate.

resultsEach interventional group demonstrated excellent clinical outcome scores including the CM Score (ACJ 83.3 ± 11.8; BR 89.0 ± 10.3; RC 81.4 ± 8.8), ASES Score (ACJ 95.5 ± 7.0; BR 92.5 ± 9.6; RC 96.5 ± 5.2), and VAS (ACJ 0.5 ± 0.9; BR 0.5 ± 0.8; RC 0.5 ± 0.8). Overall, the CG showed no significant side-to-side difference in COP, whereas the ACJ-group and the BR-group demonstrated significantly increased COP compared to the healthy side (ACJ 103 cm vs. 98 cm, p = 0.049; BR: 116 cm vs. 102 cm, p = 0.006). The RC-group revealed no significant side-to-side difference (120 cm vs. 108 cm, n.s.).

conclusionCentre of pressure measurement detected sensorimotor functional deficits following surgical treatment of the shoulder joint in patients with confirmed successful clinical and functional outcomes. This may indicate that specific postoperative training and rehabilitation protocols should be established for patients who underwent surgery of the upper extremity. These results underline that sensorimotor training should be an important component of postoperative rehabilitation and physiotherapeutic activities to improve postoperative function and joint control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Acromioclavicular JointRotator Cuff InjuriesShoulder JointArthroscopyHumansShoulderTreatment OutcomeCentre of pressureCOPRehabilitationRehabilitation of shoulderSensorimotor functionShoulder injury

Identifiers

PMID34741625
PMCPMC9165257
OpenAlexW3214613344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.