Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34741508›Full record

Observational studyHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2022

Risk of contamination of semen, vaginal secretions, follicular fluid and ovarian medulla with SARS-CoV-2 in patients undergoing ART.

K Kteily, D Pening, P Diaz Vidal, M Devos, J Dechene, A Op de Beeck, A Botteaux, S Janssens, E Van den Abbeel, O Goldrat and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reply to Author.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Reply: Risk of contamination with SARS-CoV-2 in ART.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  12. Risk of contamination with SARS-CoV-2 in ART.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K KteilyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CUB-ERASME Hospital, Fertility Clinic, Brussels, Belgium.
D PeningDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CUB-ERASME Hospital, Fertility Clinic, Brussels, Belgium.
P Diaz VidalUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Erasme Campus, Brussels, Belgium.
M DevosUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Erasme Campus, Brussels, Belgium.
J DecheneUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Erasme Campus, Brussels, Belgium.
A Op de BeeckUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, ULB Center for Diabetes Research, Erasme Campus, Brussels, Belgium.
A BotteauxMolecular Bacteriology Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Erasme Campus, Brussels, Belgium.
S JanssensDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CUB-ERASME Hospital, Fertility Clinic, IVF Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium.
E Van den AbbeelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CUB-ERASME Hospital, Fertility Clinic, IVF Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium.
O GoldratDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CUB-ERASME Hospital, Fertility Clinic, Brussels, Belgium.
A DelbaereDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CUB-ERASME Hospital, Fertility Clinic, Brussels, Belgium.
I DemeestereDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CUB-ERASME Hospital, Fertility Clinic, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3192-6565
Erasmus Hospital · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

Ferring PharmaceuticalsUniversité Libre de Bruxelles
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionCan severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA be detected in the reproductive tract of asymptomatic patients undergoing ART? SUMMARY ANSWER: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA is not detectable in semen, follicular fluid, vaginal secretions or residual medulla from ovarian tissue cryopreservation procedures in asymptomatic patients who undergo ART, irrespective of the results of a triage questionnaire and a nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection test. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had a huge impact on the activities of fertility clinics. Although some studies reported the presence of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA in the reproductive system during or after acute COVID-19 symptomatic infections, uncertainties remain regarding the presence of viral mRNA in the reproductive material and follicular fluid of asymptomatic patients undergoing ART. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: An observational cohort trial of residual material samples including semen, follicular fluid, vaginal secretions and ovarian medulla was conducted during the second pandemic wave in Brussels from September 2020 to April 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsAll patients who underwent ART (IUI, IVF/ICSI, oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation) responded to a triage questionnaire at the beginning and end of the cycle and underwent nasopharyngeal swab collection for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection by RT-PCR before the procedure according to standard recommendations. For semen analysis, only the questionnaire was requested the day before the sample collection. The ART cycles of patients with positive nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection tests and/or questionnaires were cancelled except for those that could not be postponed. After providing informed consent, swabs on residual materials were collected the day of the oocyte, ovarian tissue or semen collection and were processed for RT-qPCR. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 394 samples from 291 patients were analysed. Amongst them, 20 samples were obtained from patients with a positive questionnaire but negative nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 test and 20 others were from patients with a positive nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 test. The remaining samples were collected from patients with a negative or unknown nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 test and/or a negative or unknown triage questionnaire. Viral RNA for SARS-CoV-2 was undetectable in all of the samples. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Considering the cancellation policy, only a limited number of samples from patients with positive triage questionnaires or nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 tests were included in the analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe study suggested that there was no risk of reproductive tract contamination by SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic patients, irrespective of the results from a triage questionnaire or nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 test. The results suggested that no additional measures to prevent staff or cross-patient contamination need to be implemented in the IVF and andrology laboratories. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the Université Libre de Bruxelles and by a grant from Ferring. A.D. and I.D. received a grant from Ferring for the study. The authors have no other conflict of interest to declare related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2FemaleFollicular FluidHumansRNA, ViralSemenRNA, ViralCOVID-19cryopreservationfollicular fluidIVF/ICSIovarian tissueSARS-CoV-2semenvaginal secretions

Identifiers

PMID34741508
PMCPMC8689924
OpenAlexW3208476018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.