Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34741418›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy2022

Antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in hemodialysis patients: Is inactivated vaccine effective?

Ahmet Murt, Mehmet Rıza Altiparmak, Serap Yadigar, Serkan Feyyaz Yalin, Dogukan Ozbey, Zeynep Yildiz, Bekir Kocazeybek, Meltem Pekpak, Muveddet Rezzan Ataman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in hemodialysis patients: Is inactivated vaccine effective?Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2022
    Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmet MurtCerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1948-2914
Mehmet Rıza AltiparmakCerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serap YadigarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serkan Feyyaz YalinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Dogukan OzbeyCerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Microbiology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zeynep YildizDivision of Medical Biochemistry, Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bekir KocazeybekCerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Microbiology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Meltem PekpakCerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muveddet Rezzan AtamanCerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRDr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVaccines generally have reduced effectiveness in hemodialysis patients and a similar condition may also apply for the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The aim of this study was to analyze humoral responses of hemodialysis patients to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

methodsEighty-five maintenance hemodialysis patients who received either inactivated or mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were investigated. Antibody levels were measured by a commercial antibody kit, which detected antibodies toward receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Comparative analyzes were carried between vaccine groups and with a control group of 103 healthy volunteers.

resultsSeropositivity rate and antibody levels were significantly lower in hemodialysis patients who received inactivated vaccine (p = 0.000). While mRNA vaccine had better immunogenicity, both vaccines protected from symptomatic infection when seropositivity was achieved. DISCUSSION/

conclusionWhen used in the same dose with the general population, inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines generate reduced humoral response in hemodialysis patients. mRNA vaccines have better immunogenicity in this group.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin GmRNA VaccinesRenal DialysisSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, InactivatedVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GmRNA VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, InactivatedVaccines, SyntheticViral VaccinesCOVID-19hemodialysisimmunizationSARS-CoV-2vaccine

Identifiers

PMID34741418
PMCPMC8652476
OpenAlexW3210153799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.