ReviewClinical journal of gastroenterology2022
A double-scope technique enabled a patient with an esophageal plastic fork foreign body to avoid surgery: a case report and review of the literature.
Review in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual snare endoscopic extraction of a gastric foreign body using a dual-channel endoscope.DEN open · 2025Article
- Article
- Approaching a Fork in the Road: A Case of Aborting Endoscopy After Discovering a Retained Foreign Object.Journal of Brown hospital medicine · 2024Article
- Combination of gastroscopy and fibro‑bronchoscopy facilitates removal of incarcerated fish bone in the esophagus: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foreign body ingestion is a common problem, and endoscopic removal is often performed with ancillary equipment. However, long, sharp foreign bodies are much more difficult to remove endoscopically than other objects and require emergent surgery. A 68-year-old man with a history of distal gastrectomy accidentally swallowed a plastic fork. He complained of chest pain at the visit. The plastic fork was located between the thoracic esophagus and remnant stomach. Endoscopic removal of the plastic fork was considered difficult, and surgery was deemed necessary. However, we were able to avoid surgery to remove the object using two endoscopes with hoods and a polypectomy snare. The first endoscope covered the sharp edge with a hood, and the snare grasped the neck of the plastic fork. The second endoscope covered the remaining sharp tip. A single operator held the two endoscopes and the snare and pulled them out together. This new double-scope technique is simple and useful for removing long, sharp foreign bodies, such as forks, from the esophagus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.