Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34741215›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2021

Immunogenicity Risk Assessment for Multi-specific Therapeutics.

Mark A Kroenke, Mark N Milton, Seema Kumar, Eris Bame, Joleen T White

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark A KroenkeAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Mark N MiltonNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Seema KumarEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.
Eris BameBiogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Joleen T WhiteBill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, One Kendall Square, Building 600, Suite 6-301, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA. Joleen.white@gatesmri.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-9047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this manuscript is to provide the reader with a hypothetical case study to present an immunogenicity risk assessment for a multi-specific therapeutic as part of Investigational New Drug (IND) application. In order to provide context for the bioanalytical strategies used to support the multi-specific therapeutic presented herein, the introduction focuses on known immunogenicity risk factors. The subsequent hypothetical case study applies these principles to a specific example HC-12, based loosely on anti-TNFα and anti-IL-17A bispecific molecules previously in development, structured as an example immunogenicity risk assessment for submission to health authorities. The risk of higher incidence and safety impact of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) due to large protein complexes is explored in the context of multi-specificity and multi-valency of the therapeutic in combination with the oligomeric forms of the targets.

Indexed as

AntibodiesAntibodies, BispecificHumansIncidenceInterleukin-17Investigational New Drug ApplicationRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAntibodiesAntibodies, BispecificIL17A protein, humanInterleukin-17TNF protein, humanTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAnti-drug antibodyBispecific therapeuticImmunogenicity risk assessmentMulti-specific therapeuticOligomeric target

Identifiers

PMID34741215
PMCPMC8571146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.