Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34741200›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2021

"Context, content, and system" supporting digital health hub (DHH)-enabled models of care (MoCs) for fragility hip fractures: perspectives of diverse multidisciplinary stakeholders in South Australia from qualitative in-depth interviews.

Lalit Yadav, Tiffany K Gill, Anita Taylor, Jennifer deYoung, Renuka Visvanathan, Mellick J Chehade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lalit YadavNational Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide Medical School, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. lalit.yadav@adelaide.edu.au.
Tiffany K GillAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Anita TaylorDiscipline of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Level 5G, 581, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Jennifer deYoungDiscipline of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Level 5G, 581, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Renuka VisvanathanNational Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide Medical School, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Mellick J ChehadeNational Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide Medical School, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1102208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining thematic analysis and a human-computer persuasive systems framework suggests that hip fracture recovery among older people can be enhanced through person-centered digital health hub models of care focused on behavior change education and integrated care. The findings intend to guide settings involving comorbid conditions and low- and middle-income countries in developing innovative digital health solutions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to understand stakeholders' perspectives on the development of a digital health-enabled model of care for fragility hip fractures and to map out factors that could influence the design and implementation of such a model.

methodsQualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with stakeholders from various clinical disciplines, allied health, and computer science. A hybrid process involving thematic analysis of the raw data using inductive coding was the first step. In the second step, the tenets of a theoretical framework (health behavior change supporting systems) were deductively applied to the thematic constructs generated as part of the first step of the analysis.

resultsIn total, 24 in-depth interviews were conducted with stakeholders. We identified 18 thematic constructs presented under the categories of context, content, and system. Context covered patient characteristics such as frailty, digital literacy, and patient or carer participation, whereas healthcare delivery aspects included the structure and culture of existing practice and the need for innovative holistic models of care. Content outlines the active ingredients and approach in developing a digital health hub, and it highlights the importance of targeted education and behavior change. The system is a complicated matrix crossing different aspects of healthcare and offering a value proposition design through personalization across modes of content delivery. This must foster trust, ensure adequate financing, and support ownership and privacy by establishing appropriate mechanisms for embedding change.

conclusionThe findings from this study provide insights around potential factors related to patients, community support, and healthcare delivery influencing the design and next-stage implementation of a digital health hub model of care for fragility hip fractures.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesAgedDelivery of Health CareHumansQualitative ResearchSouth AustraliaDigital healthFrailtyHip fracturesModels of careMultimorbidityQualitative method

Identifiers

PMID34741200
PMCPMC8571011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.