Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34741196›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2021

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Comparison of Arteriosclerotic, Embolic and Tandem Lesions.

Wenjin Yang, Lei Zhang, Zifu Li, Yongxin Zhang, He Li, Weilong Hua, Jianan Li, Hongjian Zhang, Hongjian Shen, Pengfei Xing and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Basilar artery occlusion: A review of clinicoradiologic features, treatment selection, and endovascular techniques.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenjin Yang *Cerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6198-1979
Lei Zhang *Cerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5559-6292
Zifu LiCerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9332-3786
Yongxin ZhangCerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
He LiCerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0927-7666
Weilong HuaCerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2440-4857
Jianan LiCerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9776-2129
Hongjian ZhangCerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1937-2766
Hongjian ShenCerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4439-9506
Pengfei XingCerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2663-1092
Yongwei ZhangCerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9958-3098
Bo HongCerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Jianmin LiuCerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3599-8267
Pengfei YangCerebrovascular Disease Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. p.yang@vip.163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6154-3602
Second Military Medical University · CN

Funding

Health and Family Planning Committee of Pudong New Area PWZzb2017-09Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau 2018ZHYL0218Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation 18ZR1438500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to intracranial atherosclerosis-related basilar artery occlusion (ICAS-related BAO) by comparison with embolic and tandem occlusion.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with AIS due to BAO who underwent EVT. Patients were assigned to the ICAS-related group and embolic group, and tandem group based on the etiology. Baseline data, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were compared between the three groups.

resultsA total of 100 patients (ICAS-related group: 31; embolic group: 41; tandem group: 28) were included. No significant difference was observed in the successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b or 3), but the procedural time differed significantly (60 min vs. 43 min vs. 60 min, P = 0.010). There were no differences in the different intracranial hemorrhage grades among the three groups (P = 0.134). After adjusting for baseline differences, there was no significant difference in pairwise comparisons regarding favorable outcome (mRS 0-2), moderate outcome (mRS 0-3), and mortality.

conclusionsEndovascular treatment for patients with acute ICAS-related BAO had equal efficacy and safety compared with embolic BAO and tandem BAO. Primary endovascular treatment and rescue modalities were effective treatments for acute ICAS-related BAO.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresStrokeBasilar ArteryHumansRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeAcute ischemic strokeBasilar artery occlusionEmbolismEndovascular treatmentIntracranial atherosclerosisTandem occlusion

Identifiers

PMID34741196
OpenAlexW3208404111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.