ReviewPediatric radiology2022
Imaging of congenital genitourinary anomalies.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric endocrine disorders: a review of intra-abdominal findings and appropriate imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging of fetal renal development: growth curves and comparison with unilateral renal agenesis and ectopic kidneys.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Temporal trends and projections in the global burden of congenital genitourinary anomalies from 1990 to 2021: A cross-sectional study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Burden of urogenital congenital anomalies: findings from the global burden of disease study 2021.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- "Feed-and-wrap" technique versus deep sedation for neonatal magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective comparative study.European radiology · 2024Article
- Sex difference and risk factors in burden of urogenital congenital anomalies from 1990 to 2019.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital genitourinary anomalies are among the most frequent types of birth defects in neonates. Some anomalies can be a significant cause of morbidity in infancy, while others remain asymptomatic even until adulthood and can be at times the only manifestation of a complex systemic disease. The spectrum of these anomalies results from the developmental insults that can occur at various embryologic stages, and an understanding of the formation of the genitourinary system is helpful in the evaluation and treatment of a child with a congenital genitourinary anomaly. Imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis of congenital genitourinary anomalies and treatment planning. In this article, we highlight the embryologic and characteristic imaging features of various congenital genitourinary anomalies, demonstrate the utility of different imaging modalities in management, and review specific imaging modalities and protocols for image optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.