Trial reportScientific reports2021
A multicenter Spanish study of atropine 0.01% in childhood myopia progression.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of low-dose atropine eyedrops on pupil metrics: results after half a year of treatment and cessation.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Trial
- Real-world evidence for atropine titration in myopia control: a comparative study of three low-dose regimens in Chinese children.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Pretreatment myopia progression is associated with the response to 0.01% atropine: aFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Reasons for Discontinuation of Atropine 0.01% in Myopia Management: A Single-Center Retrospective Study from Türkiye.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Brimonidine tartrate 0.15% drops to reduce low post-LASIK residual myopia: A retrospective study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Prophylactic treatment of childhood myopia: a game-changer in combating the scourge of myopia?Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Myopia Control in Caucasian Children with 0.01% Atropine Eye Drops: 1-Year Follow-Up Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Low concentration atropine and myopia: a narrative review of the evidence for United Kingdom based practitioners.Eye (London, England) · 2024Review
- Age-related results over 2 years of the multicenter Spanish study of atropine 0.01% in childhood myopia progression.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Effectiveness and Tolerability of Atropine Eye Drops for Myopia Control in Non-Asian Regions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The Preventive Role of Atropine Eye Drops on Myopia Progression: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.International journal of preventive medicine · 2023Article
- Characteristics of responders to atropine 0.01% as treatment in Asian myopic children.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- Role of Atropine in the control of Myopia Progression- A Review.Beyoglu eye journal · 2022Review
- Ocular Cyclopentolate: A Mini Review Concerning Its Benefits and Risks.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atropine 0.01% eye drops for myopia control in a multicentric pediatric Spanish cohort. An interventional, prospective, multicenter study was designed. Children aged between 6 and 14 years, with myopia between - 2.00 D to - 6.00 D, astigmatism < 1.50 D and documented previous annual progression greater than - 0.5 D (cycloplegic spherical equivalent, SE) were included. Once nightly atropine 0.01% eye drops in each eye were prescribed to all participants for 12 months. Age, gender, ethnicity and iris color were registered. All patients underwent the same follow-up protocol in every center: baseline visit, telephone consultation 2 weeks later and office controls at 4, 8 and 12 months. At each visit, best-corrected visual acuity, and cycloplegic autorefraction were assessed. Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth and pupil diameter were measured on an IOL Master (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA). Adverse effects were registered in a specific questionnaire. Mean changes in cycloplegic SE and AL in the 12 months follow-up were analyzed. SE progression during treatment was compared with the SE progression in the year before enrollment for each patient. Correlation between SE and AL, and annual progression distribution were evaluated. Progression risk factors were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analyses. Of the 105 recruited children, 92 completed the treatment. Mean SE and AL changes were - 0.44 ± 0.41 D and 0.27 ± 0.20 mm respectively. Mean SE progression was lower than the year before treatment (- 0.44 ± 0.41 D versus - 1.01 ± 0.38 D; p < 0.0001). An inverse correlation between SE progression and AL progression (r: - 0.42; p < 0.0001) was found. Fifty-seven patients (62%) had a SE progression less than - 0.50 D. No risk factors associated with progression could be identified in multivariate analyses. Mean pupil diameter increment at 12-months visit was 0.74 ± 1.76 mm. The adverse effects were mild and infrequent, and decreased over the time. Atropine 0.01% is effective and safe for myopia progression control in a multicentric Spanish children cohort. We believe this efficacy might be extensible to the myopic pediatric population from Western countries with similar social and demographic features. More studies about myopia progression risk factors among atropine treated patients are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.