Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34741003›Full record

Observational studyMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2021

Evaluation of the Prognostic Role of the Wall Motion Score Index and the SYNTAX Score II in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention by Evaluation of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events at 12-Month Follow-Up.

Fanyang Kong, Li Xiang, Yanni Wu, Guangming Tong

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fanyang KongDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Li XiangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Yanni WuDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Guangming TongDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Soochow University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the wall motion score (WMS) index and the SYNTAX score II (SSII) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by evaluation of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at the 12-month follow-up at a single center. MATERIAL AND METHODS An observational study of 430 patients with ACS undergoing PCI at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University over a 1-year period was performed. Baseline data including WMS and SSII were recorded and compared with the rates of MACEs in the study group. WMS and SSII were stratified by the tercile from low to high. RESULTS Both WMS and SSII were associated with the rates of MACEs (P<0.001 and P=0.003, respectively). The incidence of MACEs was positively correlated with terciles of the WMS and SSII groups (3.7% vs 1.6% vs 7.0% [P<0.001] and 2.6% vs 5.8% vs 11.6% [P<0.001], lowest to highest, respectively). Logistic regression analyses identified combined predictors for 12-month outcome, including WMS and SSII. The use of a model combining both scores yielded a higher predictive value (area under the curve [AUC]=0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.733-0.835; P<0.001) than the use of either score alone. Using WMSs alone, the AUC was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.660-0.793; P<0.001). Using SSII alone, the AUC was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.649-0.769; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study showed that the combined methods of the WMS index and the SSII were predictive factors of MACEs in patients with ACS following PCI at the 12-month follow-up.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAcute Coronary SyndromeArrhythmias, CardiacChinaCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeartHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaMyocardiumPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID34741003
PMCPMC8579602
OpenAlexW3195422011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.