Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740952›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2022

Nuclear Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: Best Practices for Algorithm Development.

Tyler J Bradshaw, Ronald Boellaard, Joyita Dutta, Abhinav K Jha, Paul Jacobs, Quanzheng Li, Chi Liu, Arkadiusz Sitek, Babak Saboury, Peter J H Scott and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Socio-Technical Risk-Informed AI-Driven Automation Trustworthiness Evaluation (ST-RATE): Part 1-Conceptualization.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Summary Report of the SNMMI AI Task Force Radiomics Challenge 2024.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. EJNMMI research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Tyler J BradshawDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; tbradshaw@wisc.edu.
Ronald BoellaardDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joyita DuttaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts.
Abhinav K JhaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Paul JacobsMIM Software Inc., Cleveland, Ohio.
Quanzheng LiDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chi LiuDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Arkadiusz SitekSano Centre for Computational Medicine, Kraków, Poland.
Babak SabouryDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Peter J H ScottDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Piotr J SlomkaDepartment of Imaging, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
John J SunderlandDepartments of Radiology and Physics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Richard L WahlMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Fereshteh YousefiriziDepartment of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sven ZuehlsdorffSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Hoffman Estates, Illinois.
Arman RahmimDepartments of Radiology and Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and.
Irène BuvatInstitut Curie, Université PSL, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.

Funding

Longitudinal predictive modeling for tau in Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG072669 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DUTTA, JOYITA · 2021 to 2025
$2.7M
Super-Resolution Tau PET Imaging for Alzheimer's DiseaseR03AG070750 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI DUTTA, JOYITA · 2021 to 2022
$304k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG072669NIA NIH HHS R03 AG070750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nuclear medicine field has seen a rapid expansion of academic and commercial interest in developing artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. Users and developers can avoid some of the pitfalls of AI by recognizing and following best practices in AI algorithm development. In this article, recommendations on technical best practices for developing AI algorithms in nuclear medicine are provided, beginning with general recommendations and then continuing with descriptions of how one might practice these principles for specific topics within nuclear medicine. This report was produced by the AI Task Force of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNuclear MedicineAlgorithmsMolecular ImagingRadionuclide Imagingalgorithmartificial intelligencebest practicescomputer/PACSresearch methodsstatistics

Identifiers

PMID34740952
PMCPMC10949110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.