ArticleJournal of medical genetics2022
Lessons learnt from multifaceted diagnostic approaches to the first 150 families in Victoria's Undiagnosed Diseases Program.
Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Translating transcriptomics analysis into diagnostic workflows: clinical variant identification and interpretation in hypothesis-driven and hypothesis-free approaches.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- RNA Sequencing Addresses a 5' UTR Variant Leading to X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia and Broader Immune Dysregulation.Journal of clinical immunology · 2025Article
- Navigating an Uninformative Genomic Test Result: A Practical Guide.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Review
- Hospital-wide access to genomic data advanced pediatric rare disease research and clinical outcomes.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Biallelic structural variants in three patients with ERCC8-related Cockayne syndrome and a potential pitfall of copy number variation analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Experience of the first adult-focussed undiagnosed disease program in Australia (AHA-UDP): solving rare and puzzling genetic disorders is ageless.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Diagnostic utility of exome sequencing followed by research reanalysis in human brain malformations.Brain communications · 2024Article
- International Undiagnosed Diseases Programs (UDPs): components and outcomes.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Review
- Beyond the exome: What's next in diagnostic testing for Mendelian conditions.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
- Integrated multi-omics for rapid rare disease diagnosis on a national scale.Nature medicine · 2023Article
- WWOX developmental and epileptic encephalopathy: Understanding the epileptology and the mortality risk.Epilepsia · 2023Article
- Article
- Receiving Genomic Sequencing Results through the Victorian Undiagnosed Disease Program: Exploring Parental Experiences.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- seqr: A web-based analysis and collaboration tool for rare disease genomics.Human mutation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical exome sequencing typically achieves diagnostic yields of 30%-57.5% in individuals with monogenic rare diseases. Undiagnosed diseases programmes implement strategies to improve diagnostic outcomes for these individuals.
aimWe share the lessons learnt from the first 3 years of the Undiagnosed Diseases Program-Victoria, an Australian programme embedded within a clinical genetics service in the state of Victoria with a focus on paediatric rare diseases.
methodsWe enrolled families who remained without a diagnosis after clinical genomic (panel, exome or genome) sequencing between 2016 and 2018. We used family-based exome sequencing (family ES), family-based genome sequencing (family GS), RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and high-resolution chromosomal microarray (CMA) with research-based analysis.
resultsIn 150 families, we achieved a diagnosis or strong candidate in 64 (42.7%) (37 in known genes with a consistent phenotype, 3 in known genes with a novel phenotype and 24 in novel disease genes). Fifty-four diagnoses or strong candidates were made by family ES, six by family GS with RNA-seq, two by high-resolution CMA and two by data reanalysis.
conclusionWe share our lessons learnt from the programme. Flexible implementation of multiple strategies allowed for scalability and response to the availability of new technologies. Broad implementation of family ES with research-based analysis showed promising yields post a negative clinical singleton ES. RNA-seq offered multiple benefits in family ES-negative populations. International data sharing strategies were critical in facilitating collaborations to establish novel disease-gene associations. Finally, the integrated approach of a multiskilled, multidisciplinary team was fundamental to having diverse perspectives and strategic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.