Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740897›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine and community health2021

Perspectives of primary care physicians on acceptance and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination.

Philip Day, Chance Strenth, Neelima Kale, F David Schneider, Elizabeth Mayfield Arnold

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine and community health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Vaccination Open Day: A Cross-Sectional Study on the 2023 Experience in Lombardy Region, Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. COVID-19 vaccination: Is it a matter of concern?Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Philip DayDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA philip.day@umassmed.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2713-0529
Chance StrenthDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Neelima KaleDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
F David SchneiderDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Elizabeth Mayfield ArnoldDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives of primary care physicians in Texas around vaccine acceptance and potential patient barriers to vaccination. National surveys have shown fluctuating levels of acceptance for COVID-19 vaccination, and primary care physicians could play a crucial role in increasing vaccine uptake.

designThis study employed a cross-sectional anonymous survey design to collect data using an online questionnaire. Participants were asked about vaccination practices and policies at their practice site, perceptions of patient and community acceptance and confidence in responding to patient vaccine concerns.

settingFrom November 2020 to January 2021, family medicine physicians and paediatricians completed an online questionnaire on COVID-19 vaccination that was distributed by professional associations.

participantsThe survey was completed by 573 practising physicians, the majority of whom identified as family medicine physicians (71.0%) or paediatricians (25.7%), who are currently active in professional associations in Texas.

resultsAbout three-fourths (74.0%) of participants reported that they would get the vaccine as soon as it became available. They estimated that slightly more than half (59.2%) of their patients would accept the vaccine, and 67.0% expected that the COVID-19 vaccine would be accepted in their local community. The majority of participants (87.8%) reported always, almost always or usually endorsing vaccines, including high levels of intention to recommend COVID-19 vaccination (81.5%). Participants felt most confident responding to patient concerns related to education about vaccine types, safety and necessity and reported least confidence in responding to personal or religious objections to COVID-19 vaccination.

conclusionsThe majority of the physicians surveyed stated that they would receive the COVID-19 vaccination when it was available to them and were confident in their ability to respond to patient concerns. With additional education, support and shifting COVID-19 vaccinations into primary care settings, primary care physicians can use the trust they have built with their patients to address vaccine hesitancy and potentially increase acceptance and uptake.

Indexed as

COVID-19Physicians, Primary CareCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19family medicinepediatricsvaccination refusal

Identifiers

PMID34740897
PMCPMC8573291
OpenAlexW3209785539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.