Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740887›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2022

COVID-19 rapid diagnostics: practice review.

Charles Reynard, Joy A Allen, Bethany Shinkins, Graham Prestwich, Johnathan Goves, Kerrie Davies, Richard Body, CONDOR group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charles ReynardEmergency Department, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK charlie.reynard@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7534-2668
Joy A AllenNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University School of Clinical Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Tyne and Wear, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3222-0396
Bethany ShinkinsTest Evaluation Group, Leeds Institute for Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Graham PrestwichPatient and Public Involvement, Yorkshire and Humber Academic Health Science Networks, Leeds, UK.
Johnathan GovesDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kerrie DaviesHealthcare Associated Infections Research Group, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Richard BodyEmergency Department, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-8130
CONDOR group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point-of-care tests for SARS-CoV-2 could enable rapid rule-in and/or rule-out of COVID-19, allowing rapid and accurate patient cohorting and potentially reducing the risk of nosocomial transmission. As COVID-19 begins to circulate with other more common respiratory viruses, there is a need for rapid diagnostics to help clinicians test for multiple potential causative organisms simultaneously.However, the different technologies available have strengths and weaknesses that must be understood to ensure that they are used to the benefit of the patient and healthcare system. Device performance is related to the deployed context, and the diagnostic characteristics may be affected by user experience.This practice review is written by members of the UK's COVID-19 National Diagnostic Research and Evaluation programme. We discuss relative merits and test characteristics of various commercially available technologies. We do not advocate for any given test, and our coverage of commercially supplied tests is not intended to be exhaustive.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPoint-of-Care TestingSARS-CoV-2COVID-19diagnosisemergency departmentinfectious diseases

Identifiers

PMID34740887
PMCPMC8717473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.