Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740662›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2022

Comprehensive investigation of SARS-CoV-2 fate in wastewater and finding the virus transfer and destruction route through conventional activated sludge and sequencing batch reactor.

Mojtaba Pourakbar, Ali Abdolahnejad, Saber Raeghi, Farhad Ghayourdoost, Roghayeh Yousefi, Ali Behnami

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in sludge samples: A systematic review.The Science of the total environment · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Occurrence of viruses in sewage sludge: A systematic review.The Science of the total environment · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. COVID-19 and Water Variables: Review and Scientometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Biological Activated Sludge from Wastewater Treatment Plant before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mojtaba PourakbarDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran.
Ali AbdolahnejadDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran.
Saber RaeghiDepartment of Laboratory Sciences, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran.
Farhad GhayourdoostDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Roghayeh YousefiDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ali BehnamiDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran. Electronic address: ali.behnami64@gmail.com.
University of Maragheh · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRZanjan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA transmission route was thoroughly investigated in the hospital wastewater, sewage collection network, and wastewater treatment plants. Samples were taken on four occasions from December 2020 to April 2021. The performance of two different wastewater treatment processes of sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and conventional activated sludge (CAS) was studied for virus destruction. For this purpose, liquid phase, solid phase and bioaerosol samples were taken from different units of the investigated wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The results revealed that all untreated hospital wastewater samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The virus detection frequency increased when the number of hospitalized cases increased. Detection of viral RNA in the wastewater collection system exhibited higher load of virus in the generated wastewater in areas with poor socioeconomic conditions. Virus detection in the emitted bioaerosols in WWTPs showed that bioaerosols released from CAS with surface aeration contains SARS-CoV-2 RNA posing a potential threat to the working staff of the WWTPs. However, no viral RNA was detected in the bioaerosols of the SBR with diffused aeration system. Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in WWTPs showed high affinity of the virus to be accumulated in biosolids rather than transporting via liquid phase. Following the fate of virus in sludge revealed that it is completely destructed in anaerobic sludge treatment process. Therefore, based on the results of the present study, it can be concluded that receiving water resources could not be contaminated with virus, if the wastewater treatment processes work properly.

Indexed as

COVID-19SewageHumansRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2WastewaterRNA, ViralSewageWastewaterBioaerosolBiosolidsCASCOVID-19RT-qPCRSBR

Identifiers

PMID34740662
PMCPMC8563086
OpenAlexW3208204761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.