ReviewJournal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine
Mesenchymal stem cells as a platform for research on traditional medicine.
Review in Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential role of natural products in veterinary stem cell therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- AI driven network pharmacology: Multi-scale mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine from molecular to patient analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Xanthium strumarium seed extract boosts osteogenesis in human dental pulp stem cell model.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicineArticle
- Rasayana remix and harmony of healing: Blending traditional and modern medicine.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicineArticle
- Chemical preconditioning escalates chondrogenic activity in explant cultured human dental pulp stem cell study model for future temporomandibular joint regeneration.National journal of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The translation of Traditional Medicines (TMs) such as Ayurveda, and Traditional Chinese Medicine into clinical practice remains obstructed due to lack of scientific evidence by means of safety, quality, standardization, clinical efficacy, and mode of action. These limitations can be attributed to the lack of synonymous invitro models which reflect invivo features. Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) have emerged as an efficient cell source for regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. In this review, the authors discuss how hMSCs can be used as an invitro platform to screen herbs described in TMs using modern methods such as evaluation of its potential, safety, quality, mode of action, etc. Integration of traditional knowledge systems like Ayurveda and hMSCs as a platform to screen and study TMs using modern tools will effectively increase the validity of TMs as evidence-based medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.