Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740489›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi2022

Comparison of prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A multicenter cohort study and propensity-matched analysis.

Ko-Wei Chang, Han-Chung Hu, Li-Chung Chiu, Ming-Cheng Chan, Shinn-Jye Liang, Kuang-Yao Yang, Wei-Chih Chen, Wen-Feng Fang, Yu-Mu Chen, Chau-Chyun Sheu and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Ko-Wei ChangDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Han-Chung HuDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Li-Chung ChiuDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ming-Cheng ChanDivision of Critical Care and Respiratory Therapy, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan; College of Science, Tunghai University, Taiwan.
Shinn-Jye LiangDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Kuang-Yao YangDepartment of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Chih ChenDepartment of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Feng FangDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Respiratory Care, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Yu-Mu ChenDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chau-Chyun SheuDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Wei-An ChangDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hao-Chien WangDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ying-Chun ChienDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chung-Kan PengDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chieh-Liang WuCenter for Quality Management, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Office of Medical Administration, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Kuo-Chin KaoDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan. Electronic address: kck0502@cgmh.org.tw.
TSIRC (Taiwan Severe Influenza Research Consortium)
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWKaohsiung Medical University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWChang Gung University of Science and Technology · TWChina Medical University · TWKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TWTri-Service General Hospital · TWTunghai University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposeBoth prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are used as rescue therapies for severe hypoxemia in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This study compared outcomes between patients with severe influenza pneumonia-related ARDS who received prone positioning and those who received ECMO.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included eight tertiary referral centers in Taiwan. All patients who were diagnosed as having influenza pneumonia-related severe ARDS were enrolled between January and March 2016. We collected their demographic data and prone positioning and ECMO outcomes from medical records.

resultsIn total, 263 patients diagnosed as having ARDS were included, and 65 and 53 of them received prone positioning and ECMO, respectively. The baseline PaO

conclusionWhile the patients receiving prone positioning had better outcome, the causality between prone positioning and the prognosis is unknown. However, the current data suggested that patients with influenza-related ARDS may receive prone positioning before ECMO support.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationInfluenza, HumanRespiratory Distress SyndromeCohort StudiesHumansProne PositionRetrospective StudiesAcute respiratory distress syndromeExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationProne positioning

Identifiers

PMID34740489
PMCPMC8519810
OpenAlexW3206913991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.