Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740484›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2022

Assessing the determinants of completing OAT induction and long-term retention: A population-based study in British Columbia, Canada.

Megan Kurz, Jeong Eun Min, Laura M Dale, Bohdan Nosyk

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Megan KurzCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jeong Eun MinCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Laura M DaleCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Bohdan NosykCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: bnosyk@sfu.ca.
Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences · CASimon Fraser University · CA

Funding

DAT-Emulating target trials with big data to strengthen the evidence base for the clinical management of opioid use disorderR01DA050629 · NIDA · SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY · PI NOSYK, BOHDAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA050629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacological treatments for opioid use disorder are essential, life-saving medications, yet successful induction of them and long-term retention on them is limited in many settings. Induction into opioid agonist treatment (OAT) features the highest risk of mortality throughout the treatment course, and greatest risk of discontinuation. We aimed to identify determinants of completing OAT induction and, among those completing induction, time to OAT discontinuation in British Columbia (BC), Canada.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study using linked population-level health administrative databases to capture all individuals in BC receiving at least one OAT dispensation from January 1, 2008, to September 30, 2018. We constructed covariates capturing client demographics, clinical history, and characteristics of the treatment episode and the primary prescribing physician. We estimated a two-part model to identify determinants of the probability of completing induction using a generalized linear mixed model with logit link and the time to OAT discontinuation among those completing induction using a Cox proportional hazards frailty model.

resultsWe observed 220,474 OAT episodes (73.9% initiated with methadone, 24.7% with buprenorphine, and 1.4% with slow-release oral morphine) among 45,608 individuals over the study period. Less than 60% of all OAT episodes completed induction (59.0% for methadone episodes, 56.7% for buprenorphine/naloxone, 41.0% for slow-release oral morphine) and half of all episodes that completed induction reached the minimum effective dosage (51.0% for methadone episodes [60 mg/day], 48.2% for buprenorphine/naloxone [12 mg/day], 59.4% for slow-release oral morphine [240 mg/day]). In multiple regression analysis, the adjusted odds of completing induction with buprenorphine improved over time, exceeding that of methadone in 2018: 1.46 (1.40, 1.51). For those who completed induction, buprenorphine use was associated with shorter times to discontinuation throughout the study period, but the estimated rate of discontinuation decreased over time (adjusted hazard ratio, vs. methadone in 2008: 2.50 (2.35, 2.66); in 2018: 1.79 (1.74, 1.85)).

conclusionWe found low rates of completing OAT induction and, for those who did complete it, low rates of reaching the minimum effective dose.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidAvenaBritish ColumbiaHumansMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneOpioid agonist treatmentOpioid use disorderTreatment inductionTreatment retention

Identifiers

PMID34740484
PMCPMC9833672
OpenAlexW3210806867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.