Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740466›Full record

ArticleClinical therapeutics2021

The Utility of Remote Inspections During the COVID-19 Health Emergency and in the Postpandemic Setting.

Sarah Mofid, Winona Rei Bolislis, Clive Brading, Nigel Hamilton, Cyril Hardit, Makoto Nagaoka, Julien Parain, Maria Zanta, Thomas C Kühler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah MofidGlobal Regulatory Science and Policy, Sanofi R&D, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
Winona Rei BolislisGlobal Regulatory Science and Policy, Sanofi R&D, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
Clive BradingGlobal Quality External Liaisons, GB Aventis Pharma Ltd, Reading, United Kingdom.
Nigel HamiltonGlobal Quality External Liaisons, Sanofi Winthrop Industrie, Gentilly, France.
Cyril HarditGlobal Quality External Liaisons, Sanofi Winthrop Industrie, Gentilly, France.
Makoto NagaokaGlobal Regulatory Science and Policy, Sanofi KK, Tokyo, Japan.
Julien ParainSanofi Pasteur Global Quality, Inspection Readiness & Site Support, Lyon-Carteret, France.
Maria ZantaSanofi Pasteur Global Quality, Inspection Readiness & Site Support, Lyon-Carteret, France.
Thomas C KühlerGlobal Regulatory Science and Policy, Sanofi R&D, Chilly-Mazarin, France. Electronic address: thomas.kuhler@sanofi.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected the management and operation of regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry around the world. It has prompted regulatory authorities to consider new ways of working and introduced, among others, remote inspections to validate the integrity of the regulatory data submitted by companies, to evaluate the quality of production and manufacturing sites, and to ensure the conformity with Good Regulatory Practices with the overall goal of guaranteeing patient safety during the crisis.

methodThis article summarizes and discusses remote inspection guidelines and other related information made available by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (Japan), the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (United Kingdom), and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We also analyze the effect of the pandemic on inspections conducted by the inspectorates of the EMA and the FDA.

findingsThe regulatory authorities that we studied all recognized the importance of implementing regulatory policies on remote inspections in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The remote inspection guidelines from the 5 selected regulatory authorities aimed at mitigating the impact of the pandemic but, while providing valuable advice to the pharmaceutical companies and being similar in intent, were not always aligned in terms of approach and solutions. IMPLICATIONS: On-site inspections are likely to continue to be the norm and the preferred standard for the foreseeable future. However, health authorities will need to further adopt a risk-based inspection approach and stimulate the increased uptake of inspection reliance as proposed by the Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention and Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme not to overwhelm the pharmaceutical companies with repeat and redundant inspections. Remote inspections have proven to be a new inspection tool, but health authorities should align on their approach to remote inspections in terms of methods applied and documentation requested.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug IndustryHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationCOVID-19pandemicregulatory agilitiesremote inspections

Identifiers

PMID34740466
PMCPMC8511654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.