Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740374›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2021

Chlorpromazine induces cytotoxic autophagy in glioblastoma cells via endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response.

Silvia Matteoni, Paola Matarrese, Barbara Ascione, Lucia Ricci-Vitiani, Roberto Pallini, Veronica Villani, Andrea Pace, Marco G Paggi, Claudia Abbruzzese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Evidence for cytoprotective autophagy in response to HER2-targeted monoclonal antibodies.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Silvia Matteoni *Cellular Networks and Molecular Therapeutic Targets, Proteomics Unit, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Paola Matarrese *Department of Therapeutic Research and Medicines Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Barbara AscioneDepartment of Therapeutic Research and Medicines Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Lucia Ricci-VitianiDepartment of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Roberto PalliniInstitute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University School of Medicine, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Veronica VillaniNeuro-Oncology, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Andrea PaceNeuro-Oncology, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Marco G PaggiCellular Networks and Molecular Therapeutic Targets, Proteomics Unit, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144, Rome, Italy. marco.paggi@ifo.gov.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9445-442X
Claudia AbbruzzeseCellular Networks and Molecular Therapeutic Targets, Proteomics Unit, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144, Rome, Italy. claudia.abbruzzese@ifo.gov.it.

Funding

Peretti Foundation NaEPF 2019-042Ricerca Corrente IRE N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM; grade IV glioma) is characterized by a very short overall survival time and extremely low 5-year survival rates. We intend to promote experimental and clinical research on rationale and scientifically driven drug repurposing. This may represent a safe and often inexpensive way to propose novel pharmacological approaches to GBM. Our precedent work describes the role of chlorpromazine (CPZ) in hindering malignant features of GBM. Here, we investigate in greater detail the molecular mechanisms at the basis of the effect of CPZ on GBM cells.

methodsWe employed proteomics platforms, i.e., activity-based protein profiling plus mass spectrometry, to identify potential cellular targets of the drug. Then, by means of established molecular and cellular biology techniques, we assessed the effects of this drug on GBM cell metabolic and survival pathways.

resultsThe experimental output indicated as putative targets of CPZ several of factors implicated in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, with consequent unfolded protein response (UPR). Such a perturbation culminated in a noticeable reactive oxygen species generation and intense autophagic response that resulted in cytotoxic and abortive effects for six GBM cell lines, three of which growing as neurospheres, while it appeared cytoprotective for the RPE-1 human non-cancer neuro-ectodermal cell line.

conclusionsThis discrepancy could be central in explaining the lethal effects of the drug on GBM cells and the relatively scarce cytotoxicity toward normal tissues attributed to this compound. The data presented here offer support to the multicenter phase II clinical trial we have undertaken, which consists of the addition of CPZ to first-line treatment of GBM patients carrying a hypo- or un-methylated MGMT gene, i.e. those characterized by intrinsic resistance to temozolomide.

Indexed as

AutophagyChlorpromazineDopamine AntagonistsEndoplasmic Reticulum StressGlioblastomaHumansSurvival AnalysisUnfolded Protein ResponseChlorpromazineDopamine AntagonistsAutophagyCell deathChlorpromazineDrug repurposingEndoplasmic reticulum stressGlioblastomaMitotic catastropheUnfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID34740374
PMCPMC8569984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.