Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740353›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Length of exposure to long working hours and night work and risk of sickness absence: a register-based cohort study.

Laura Peutere, Tom Rosenström, Aki Koskinen, Mikko Härmä, Mika Kivimäki, Marianna Virtanen, Jenni Ervasti, Annina Ropponen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Longitudinal Study on Trajectories of Night Work and Sickness Absence among Hospital Employees.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura PeutereSchool of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland. laura.peutere@uef.fi.
Tom RosenströmDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Aki KoskinenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikko HärmäFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Mika KivimäkiFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Marianna VirtanenSchool of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.
Jenni ErvastiFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Annina RopponenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is inconsistent evidence that long working hours and night work are risk factors for sickness absence, but few studies have considered variation in the length of exposure time window as a potential source of mixed findings. We examined whether the association of long working hours and night work with sickness absence is dependent on the length of exposure to the working hour characteristics.

methodsWe analysed records of working hours, night work and sickness absence for a cohort of 9226 employees in one hospital district in Finland between 2008 and 2019. The exposure time windows ranged from 10 to 180 days, and we used Cox's proportional hazards models with time-dependent exposures to analyse the associations between working-hour characteristics and subsequent sickness absence.

resultsLonger working hours for a period of 10 to 30 days was not associated with the risk of sickness absence whereas longer working hours for a period of 40 to 180 days was associated with a lower risk of sickness absence. Irrespective of exposure time window, night work was not associated with sickness absence.

conclusionsIt is important to consider the length of exposure time window when examining associations between long working hours and sickness absence, whereas the association between night work and sickness absence is not similarly sensitive to exposure times.

Indexed as

Sick LeaveWork Schedule ToleranceCohort StudiesFinlandHumansRisk FactorsExposure timeNight workNursesShift workSickness absenceWorking hours

Identifiers

PMID34740353
PMCPMC8571875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.