Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740352›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Determinants and levels of cervical Cancer screening uptake among women of reproductive age in South Africa: evidence from South Africa Demographic and health survey data, 2016.

Monica Ewomazino Akokuwebe, Erhabor Sunday Idemudia, Abiel M Lekulo, Ogone Warona Motlogeloa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Barriers to Radiotherapy Access in Sub-Saharan Africa for Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monica Ewomazino AkokuwebeNorth-West University Faculty of Humanities, North-West University, Mafikeng, South Africa. monica.akokuwebe@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8945-345X
Erhabor Sunday IdemudiaNorth-West University Faculty of Humanities, North-West University, Mafikeng, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5522-7435
Abiel M LekuloNorth-West University Faculty of Humanities, North-West University, Mafikeng, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3826-4477
Ogone Warona MotlogeloaNorth-West University Faculty of Humanities, North-West University, Mafikeng, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2939-4296

Funding

UCLA-South African Research in Trauma Training ProgramD43TW007278 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WYATT, GAIL E. · 2005 to 2020
$3.1M
Sustainable Academic Capacity Building of Excellence through Research and Training Program (SACERT) Learning CollaborativeD43TW012029 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MILBURN, NORWEETA GERMAINE, WYATT, GAIL E. · 2021 to 2025
$1.5M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW007278FIC NIH HHS D43 TW012029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer (CC) is the cancer with the most incidents and the leading cause of cancer mortality among women in South Africa. CC screening is one of the most cost-effective control approaches for the disease burden. This study assessed the determinants and individual-level indicators of cervical cancer screening uptake among women of reproductive age in South Africa.

methodsWe analyzed data from the 2016 South Africa Demographic Health Survey. Our analysis focused on 5903 women (15-49 years). We conducted Chi-square test for bivariate analysis, and multivariate binary logistics regression was used to analyze independent association between individual-level factors and women who have had Pap smear testing. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

resultsThe mean age at cervical cancer screening uptake among women in South Africa was 40.8 years (SD 18.6, range 15-95 years). A majority of the women (39.3%) were aged 45 years and above and 54.6% of them resides in urban settlements. About 35.4% of women (n = 2098) have had a Pap smear test, with 66.5% of them who had a Pap smear test resides in Western Cape province. The proportion of women who had a Pap smear test was significantly higher among those with higher educational attainment (68.7%, p = 0.000), in the rich wealth index (50.1%, p = 0.000), and those with health insurance cover (60.3%, p = 0.000). Pap smear testing was found to be more prevalent among women aged 45

conclusionsThe prevalence of cervical cancer uptake is substantially low among women aged 15-24 years in South Africa and shows a degree of between-provinces differences. Therefore, heath educational interventions aimed at increasing the uptake of cervical cancer screening services in South Africa are critically needed.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDemographyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestSouth AfricaVaginal SmearsYoung AdultCervical cancerDeterminantsLevelsReproductive ageScreeningSouth AfricaWomen

Identifiers

PMID34740352
PMCPMC8571865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.