Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740343›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2021

Evaluating the structural reform of outpatient psychotherapy in Germany (ES-RiP trial) - a qualitative study of provider perspectives.

Regina Poß-Doering, Martin Hegelow, Milena Borchers, Mechthild Hartmann, Johannes Kruse, Hanna Kampling, Gereon Heuft, Carsten Spitzer, Beate Wild, Joachim Szecsenyi and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The gendered devaluation of psychotherapy.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Regina Poß-DoeringDepartment. of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. regina.poss-doering@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Martin HegelowDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg, Germany.
Milena BorchersDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mechthild HartmannDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg, Germany.
Johannes KruseDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center of the Justus-Liebig-University, Friedrichstraße 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Hanna KamplingDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center of the Justus-Liebig-University, Friedrichstraße 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Gereon HeuftUniversity Hospital Muenster, Section Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 (Geb. A9), D-48149, Münster, Germany.
Carsten SpitzerUniversity Medicine Rostock, Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.
Beate WildDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg, Germany.
Joachim SzecsenyiDepartment. of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans-Christoph FriederichDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Rostock · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to outpatient mental healthcare can be challenging for patients. In Germany, a national structural reform was implemented in 2017 to accelerate and enhance access to outpatient psychotherapy and reduce waiting times. During the first phase of the study 'Evaluation of a structural reform of the outpatient psychotherapy guideline (ES-RiP)' and embedded into a process evaluation, the implementation was to be evaluated through assessing general practitioners' (GPs) and psychotherapists' (PTs) perspectives regarding utilization of provided new measures, and perceived potential for optimization. Particular focus was on patients with a comorbidity of mental disorders and chronic physical conditions (cMPs).

methodsThis exploratory cross-sectional qualitative study used on-site and online focus group discussions and semi-structured telephone interviews with GPs and outpatient PTs. Generated data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participant characteristics collected via a socio-demographic questionnaire.

resultsPerspectives on the structural reform were heterogenous. GPs and PTs considered the component of timely initial psychotherapeutic assessment consultations beneficial. GPs disapproved of their deficits in detailed information about the structural reform and exchange with outpatient PTs. Improvement suggestions included structured short information exchange and joint quality circles. The overall number of available outpatient PTs in rural areas was perceived as insufficient. For patients with cMPs, GPs saw patient barriers for therapy access and continuity in low intrinsic motivation, physical impediments and older age. PTs also saw patient challenges regarding low intrinsic motivation and keeping scheduled appointments. They considered post-reform administrative efforts to be high and reported that the regulations (conformity) lead to planning difficulties and financial losses. Reform elements were tailored to fit in with PTs key therapy areas. Stronger networking and joint lectures were suggested as remedy for the currently still limited exchange with GPs. Unlike the GPs, PTs emphasized that accepting patients into psychotherapeutic treatment was independent of a possibly present chronic physical disease.

conclusionsThe findings contribute to understanding the integration of the delivered structural reform into daily care processes and provide an indication about reached targets and potential improvements. Further phases of the ES-RiP study can build on the findings and broaden insights.

trial registrationRegistration-ID DRKS00020344 (DRKS German Register of Clinical Trials.

Indexed as

General PractitionersOutpatientsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansPsychotherapyQualitative ResearchEvaluationGermanyMental healthOutpatient psychotherapyQualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID34740343
PMCPMC8570230
OpenAlexW3177757918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.