Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740244›Full record

ArticleGenetics2021

Genomic mating in outbred species: predicting cross usefulness with additive and total genetic covariance matrices.

Marnin D Wolfe, Ariel W Chan, Peter Kulakow, Ismail Rabbi, Jean-Luc Jannink

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A comparative study on recombination activity in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Practical Considerations When Using Mendelian Sampling Variances for Selection Decisions in Genomic Selection Programs.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Why usefulness is rarely useful.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marnin D WolfeSection on Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5929-5785
Ariel W ChanSection on Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
Peter KulakowInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria.
Ismail RabbiInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria.
Jean-Luc JanninkSection on Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diverse crops are both outbred and clonally propagated. Breeders typically use truncation selection of parents and invest significant time, land, and money evaluating the progeny of crosses to find exceptional genotypes. We developed and tested genomic mate selection criteria suitable for organisms of arbitrary homozygosity level where the full-sibling progeny are of direct interest as future parents and/or cultivars. We extended cross variance and covariance variance prediction to include dominance effects and predicted the multivariate selection index genetic variance of crosses based on haplotypes of proposed parents, marker effects, and recombination frequencies. We combined the predicted mean and variance into usefulness criteria for parent and variety development. We present an empirical study of cassava (Manihot esculenta), a staple tropical root crop. We assessed the potential to predict the multivariate genetic distribution (means, variances, and trait covariances) of 462 cassava families in terms of additive and total value using cross-validation. Most variance (89%) and covariance (70%) prediction accuracy estimates were greater than zero. The usefulness of crosses was accurately predicted with good correspondence between the predicted and the actual mean performance of family members breeders selected for advancement as new parents and candidate varieties. We also used a directional dominance model to quantify significant inbreeding depression for most traits. We predicted 47,083 possible crosses of 306 parents and contrasted them to those previously tested to show how mate selection can reveal the new potential within the germplasm. We enable breeders to consider the potential of crosses to produce future parents (progeny with top breeding values) and varieties (progeny with top own performance).

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPlant BreedingCrops, AgriculturalCrosses, GeneticGenetic VariationGenome, PlantManihotcassavadirectional dominancegenomic mate selectionGenomic PredictionGenPrednonadditive effectsShared Data Resourcesvariance prediction

Identifiers

PMID34740244
PMCPMC8570794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.