ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2022
Finite element analysis in clinical patients with atherosclerosis.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven virtual histology with optical coherence tomography for comparing acute and short-trem performance of bioresorbable scaffolds and drug-eluting stents.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
- Biomechanical stress profiling in coronary arteries via two-phase blood FSI.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- Layer-specific residual strains in human carotid arteries revealed under layer separation.PloS one · 2025Article
- Articulating the Pharmacological and Nanotechnological Aspects of Genistein: Current and Future Prospectives.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2024Review
- Expatiating the Pharmacological and Nanotechnological Aspects of the Alkaloidal Drug Berberine: Current and Future Trends.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endovascular plaque composition is strongly related to stent strut stress and is responsible for strut fatigue, stent failure, and possible in-stent restenosis. To evaluate the effect of plaque on artery wall resistance to expansion we performed in silico analysis of atherosclerotic vessels. We generated finite element models from in vivo intravascular ultrasound virtual histology images to determine local artery surface stiffness and determined which plaque structures have the greatest influence. We validated the predictive capacity of our modeling approach by testing an atherosclerotic peripheral artery ex vivo with pressure-inflation testing at physiological pressures ranging from 10 to 200 mmHg. For this purpose, the in silico deformation of the arterial wall was compared to that observed ex vivo. We found that calcification had a positive effect on surface stiffness with fibrous plaque and necrotic core having negative effects. Additionally, larger plaque structures demonstrated significantly higher average surface stiffness and calcification located nearer the lumen was also shown to increase surface stiffness. Therefore, more developed plaques will have greater resistance to expansion and higher stent strut stress, with calcification located near the lumen further increasing stress in localized areas. Thus, it may be expected that such plaque structures may increase the likelihood of localized stent strut fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.