ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2021
Clustered sparsity and Poisson-gap sampling.
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoherence Principles and Algorithms for One-Dimensional Nonuniform Sampling Schedules for Multidimensional NMR.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Sequential backbone chemical shift assignments of a cancer-associated isoform of the HBx protein from human hepatitis B virus.Biomolecular NMR assignments · 2025Article
- Evaluating metrics of spectral quality in nonuniform sampling.Journal of magnetic resonance open · 2025Article
- Expanding the Limits of Structural Characterization of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter Using Nonuniform Sampling Frequency-Reversed Edited HSQC NMR.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Non-uniform sampling of similar NMR spectra and its application to studies of the interaction between alpha-synuclein and liposomes.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2023Article
- nus-tool: A unified program for generating and analyzing sample schedules for nonuniformly sampled NMR experiments.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2023Article
- Deeper Insight into Photopolymerization: The Synergy of Time-Resolved Nonuniform Sampling and Diffusion NMR.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022Article
- High fidelity sampling schedules for NMR spectra of high dynamic range.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-uniform sampling (NUS) is a popular way of reducing the amount of time taken by multidimensional NMR experiments. Among the various non-uniform sampling schemes that exist, the Poisson-gap (PG) schedules are particularly popular, especially when combined with compressed-sensing (CS) reconstruction of missing data points. However, the use of PG is based mainly on practical experience and has not, as yet, been explained in terms of CS theory. Moreover, an apparent contradiction exists between the reported effectiveness of PG and CS theory, which states that a "flat" pseudo-random generator is the best way to generate sampling schedules in order to reconstruct sparse spectra. In this paper we explain how, and in what situations, PG reveals its superior features in NMR spectroscopy. We support our theoretical considerations with simulations and analyses of experimental data from the Biological Magnetic Resonance Bank (BMRB). Our analyses reveal a previously unnoticed feature of many NMR spectra that explains the success of "blue-noise" schedules, such as PG. We call this feature "clustered sparsity". This refers to the fact that the peaks in NMR spectra are not just sparse but often form clusters in the indirect dimension, and PG is particularly suited to deal with such situations. Additionally, we discuss why denser sampling in the initial and final parts of the clustered signal may be useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.