Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34739685›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2021

Clustered sparsity and Poisson-gap sampling.

Paweł Kasprzak, Mateusz Urbańczyk, Krzysztof Kazimierczuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating metrics of spectral quality in nonuniform sampling.Journal of magnetic resonance open · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. High fidelity sampling schedules for NMR spectra of high dynamic range.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paweł KasprzakCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2C, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Mateusz UrbańczykCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2C, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof KazimierczukCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2C, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland. k.kazimierczuk@cent.uw.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9585-1737

Funding

fundacja na rzecz nauki polskiej POIR.04.04.00-00-4343/17-00narodowe centrum nauki 2017/26/M/ST4/01053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-uniform sampling (NUS) is a popular way of reducing the amount of time taken by multidimensional NMR experiments. Among the various non-uniform sampling schemes that exist, the Poisson-gap (PG) schedules are particularly popular, especially when combined with compressed-sensing (CS) reconstruction of missing data points. However, the use of PG is based mainly on practical experience and has not, as yet, been explained in terms of CS theory. Moreover, an apparent contradiction exists between the reported effectiveness of PG and CS theory, which states that a "flat" pseudo-random generator is the best way to generate sampling schedules in order to reconstruct sparse spectra. In this paper we explain how, and in what situations, PG reveals its superior features in NMR spectroscopy. We support our theoretical considerations with simulations and analyses of experimental data from the Biological Magnetic Resonance Bank (BMRB). Our analyses reveal a previously unnoticed feature of many NMR spectra that explains the success of "blue-noise" schedules, such as PG. We call this feature "clustered sparsity". This refers to the fact that the peaks in NMR spectra are not just sparse but often form clusters in the indirect dimension, and PG is particularly suited to deal with such situations. Additionally, we discuss why denser sampling in the initial and final parts of the clustered signal may be useful.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularTimeBlue-noise samplingClustered sparsityCompressed sensingIterative soft thresholdingNon-uniform samplingPoisson-gap sampling

Identifiers

PMID34739685
PMCPMC8642362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.