Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34739667›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Prediction of effluent arsenic concentration of wastewater treatment plants using machine learning and kriging-based models.

Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani, Meysam Alizamir, Behrooz Keshtegar, Okke Batelaan, Reinhard Hinkelmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad Zounemat-KermaniDepartment of Water Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran. zounemat@uk.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1421-8671
Meysam AlizamirDepartment of Civil Engineering, Hamedan branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.
Behrooz KeshtegarDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zabol, P.B. 9861335-856, Zabol, Iran.
Okke BatelaanNational Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Reinhard HinkelmannChair of Water Resources Management and Modeling of Hydrosystems, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the potential of kriging-based (kriging and kriging-logistic) and machine learning models (MARS, GBRT, and ANN) in predicting the effluent arsenic concentration of a wastewater treatment plant. Two distinct input combination scenarios were established, using seven quantitative and qualitative independent influent variables. In the first scenario, all of the seven independent variables were taken into account for constructing the data-driven models. For the second input scenario, the forward selection k-fold cross-validation method was employed to select effective explanatory influent parameters. The results obtained from both input scenarios show that the kriging-logistic and machine learning models are effective and robust. However, using the feature selection procedure in the second scenario not only made the architecture of the model simpler and more effective, but also enhanced the performance of the developed models (e.g., around 7.8% performance enhancement of the RMSE). Although the standard kriging method provided the least good predictive results (RMSE = 0.18 ug/l and NSE=0.75), it was revealed that the kriging-logistic method gave the best performance among the applied models (RMSE = 0.11 ug/l and NSE=0.90).

Indexed as

ArsenicWater PurificationMachine LearningSpatial AnalysisArsenicArsenic mitigationArtificial neural networksGradient boosted regression treesKriging-logisticMultivariate adaptive regression splines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.