Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34739581›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2022

Evidence for differences in DNA methylation between Germans and Japanese.

J Becker, P Böhme, A Reckert, S B Eickhoff, B E Koop, J Blum, T Gündüz, M Takayama, W Wagner, S Ritz-Timme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How to Translate DNA Methylation Biomarkers Into Clinical Practice.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

J BeckerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. Julia.Becker@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
P BöhmeInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
A ReckertInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
S B EickhoffInstitute for Systems Neuroscience, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
B E KoopInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
J BlumInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
T GündüzInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
M TakayamaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
W WagnerHelmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Stem Cell Biology and Cellular Engineering, RWTH Aachen University Medical School, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
S Ritz-TimmeInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RI 704/4-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft WA 1706/8-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a contribution to the discussion about the possible effects of ethnicity/ancestry on age estimation based on DNA methylation (DNAm) patterns, we directly compared age-associated DNAm in German and Japanese donors in one laboratory under identical conditions. DNAm was analyzed by pyrosequencing for 22 CpG sites (CpGs) in the genes PDE4C, RPA2, ELOVL2, DDO, and EDARADD in buccal mucosa samples from German and Japanese donors (N = 368 and N = 89, respectively).Twenty of these CpGs revealed a very high correlation with age and were subsequently tested for differences between German and Japanese donors aged between 10 and 65 years (N = 287 and N = 83, respectively). ANCOVA was performed by testing the Japanese samples against age- and sex-matched German subsamples (N = 83 each; extracted 500 times from the German total sample). The median p values suggest a strong evidence for significant differences (p < 0.05) at least for two CpGs (EDARADD, CpG 2, and PDE4C, CpG 2) and no differences for 11 CpGs (p > 0.3).Age prediction models based on DNAm data from all 20 CpGs from German training data did not reveal relevant differences between the Japanese test samples and German subsamples. Obviously, the high number of included "robust CpGs" prevented relevant effects of differences in DNAm at two CpGs.Nevertheless, the presented data demonstrates the need for further research regarding the impact of confounding factors on DNAm in the context of ethnicity/ancestry to ensure a high quality of age estimation. One approach may be the search for "robust" CpG markers-which requires the targeted investigation of different populations, at best by collaborative research with coordinated research strategies.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationMouth MucosaAdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkersChildCpG IslandsHumansJapanMiddle AgedYoung AdultBiomarkersDNA methylationEpigenetic age estimationForensic age estimationImpact of ancestry/ethnicity

Identifiers

PMID34739581
PMCPMC8847189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.