Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34739469›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2021

2020-21 Influenza vaccination campaign strategy as a model for the third COVID-19 vaccine dose?

Maurizio Lecce, Pier Mario Perrone, Federica Bonalumi, Silvana Castaldi, Monica Cremonesi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Factors behind Antibiotic Therapy: A Survey of Primary Care Pediatricians in Lombardy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Vaccination Open Day: A Cross-Sectional Study on the 2023 Experience in Lombardy Region, Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maurizio LecceUniversità degli studi di Milano. maurizio.lecce@unimi.it.
Pier Mario Perronea:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:33:"Università degli studi di Milano";}. piermario.perrone@unimi.it.
Federica BonalumiIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Policlinico di Milano. federica.bonalumi@policlinico.mi.it.
Silvana CastaldiUniversità degli studi di Milano. silvana.castaldi@unimi.it.
Monica CremonesiIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Policlinico di Milano. monica.cremonesi@policlinico.mi.it.
University of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimSeasonal influenza exerts a deep and multi-level impact on population and public health systems. Among at risk groups, healthcare workers (HCWs) represent a crucial one due to the threat of absenteeism and consequent disruption of healthcare services (and economic losses). Also in this group vaccine hesitancy is a well known issue, therefore innovative and 360-degree strategies are urgently needed to overcome the problem.

methodsin the 2020-21 influenza vaccination campaign in a research and teaching hospital in Milan, Italy, the working group implemented three different strategies: the offer of vaccination through both an ad hoc ambulatory and several itinerant (on site) vaccinating teams, a promotional and educational communication campaign, a gaming strategy Results: vaccinated employees nearly doubled (2103 vs 1153 in 2019-20 flu vaccination campaign), reaching a comprehensive vaccination coverage rate (VCR) of 43,1%. A highly significant increase in the 40-59 age group was registered. While physicians and nursing staff confirmed to be the most represented categories among vaccinated subjects, administrative and auxiliary staffs performed the greatest increase compared to the previous campaign. The on site vaccination was clearly preferred than the ad hoc one (1693 HCWs, 80,5% vs 410, 19,5%). Vaccinated for the first time registered a significant increase (40,2% vs 36,2% in 2019-20 campaign).

conclusionssuch meaningful results confirm the effectiveness of the strategies implemented in the present campaign, suggesting their possible application in the debated COVID19-third-dose vaccination campaign.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelHospitals, TeachingHumansImmunization ProgramsSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34739469
PMCPMC8851003
OpenAlexW3209592322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.