Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34739455›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2021

One-week longitudinal daily description of moral distress, coping, and general health in healthcare workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy: A quantitative diary study.

Duilio F Manara, Giulia Villa, Lisa Korelic, Cristina Arrigoni, Federica Dellafiore, Valentina Milani, Greta Ghizzardi, Arianna Magon, Noemi Giannetta, Rosario Caruso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Duilio F ManaraCenter for Nursing Research and Innovation, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan. manara.duilio@hsr.it.
Giulia VillaCenter for Nursing Research and Innovation, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan. villa.giulia@hsr.it.
Lisa KorelicNephrology and Rheumatology ward, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy. lisa.korelic01@universitadipavia.it.
Cristina Arrigoni3Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Hygiene, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. cristina.arrigoni@unipv.it.
Federica DellafioreDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Hygiene, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. federica.dellafiore@unipv.it.
Valentina MilaniBiostatistics service, Scientific Directorate, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy. valentina.milani@grupposandonato.it.
Greta GhizzardiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. gretaghizza91@gmail.com.
Arianna MagonHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy. arianna.magon@grupposandonato.it.
Noemi GiannettaFaculty of Philosophy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. giannetta.noemi@hsr.it.
Rosario CarusoHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy. rosario.caruso@grupposandonato.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim of the work .The fluctuation from day to day within a working week of moral distress, coping, and general health of frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) in facing the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic has been poorly studied. This study described the weekly fluctuation from day to day of moral distress, coping, and general health in frontline HCWs who worked during the first epidemic wave (May-June 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.

methodsThis study has an intensive longitudinal design, and a convenience sampling procedure was employed to enroll physicians, nurses, allied health professions, and healthcare assistants. Data collection was performed using diary encompassed four sections: a socio-demographic form (required only at the baseline data collection) and three scales to assess moral distress, coping, and general health.

resultsResults confirmed poor perceived health and mild moral distress in frontline HCWs, especially in HCWs with offspring, during the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic and the stability of their daily perception over a working week regarding moral distress, general health, and avoidant coping strategy, while approach coping strategy reported a slight fluctuation over time.

conclusionsAccordingly, on the one hand, these results confirm that outcomes regarding mental health and moral distress are pretty stable and provide insights, on the other hand, regarding the possible organizational interventions to support approach coping strategy as it seems more susceptible to variation over time.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdaptation, PsychologicalDisease OutbreaksHealth PersonnelHumansMoralsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34739455
PMCPMC8851029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.