Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34739369›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2021

Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification.

Oliver Schwengers, Lukas Jelonek, Marius Alfred Dieckmann, Sebastian Beyvers, Jochen Blom, Alexander Goesmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,047 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,047citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,047 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A probioticGut microbes · 2026
    Article
  4. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emergence ofVirulence · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. 'International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Members of theMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  18. Global genomic landscape of theNew microbes and new infections · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

987 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Oliver SchwengersBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen 35392, Germany.
Lukas JelonekBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen 35392, Germany.
Marius Alfred DieckmannBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen 35392, Germany.
Sebastian BeyversBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen 35392, Germany.
Jochen BlomBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen 35392, Germany.
Alexander GoesmannBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen 35392, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Command-line annotation software tools have continuously gained popularity compared to centralized online services due to the worldwide increase of sequenced bacterial genomes. However, results of existing command-line software pipelines heavily depend on taxon-specific databases or sufficiently well annotated reference genomes. Here, we introduce Bakta, a new command-line software tool for the robust, taxon-independent, thorough and, nonetheless, fast annotation of bacterial genomes. Bakta conducts a comprehensive annotation workflow including the detection of small proteins taking into account replicon metadata. The annotation of coding sequences is accelerated via an alignment-free sequence identification approach that in addition facilitates the precise assignment of public database cross-references. Annotation results are exported in GFF3 and International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC)-compliant flat files, as well as comprehensive JSON files, facilitating automated downstream analysis. We compared Bakta to other rapid contemporary command-line annotation software tools in both targeted and taxonomically broad benchmarks including isolates and metagenomic-assembled genomes. We demonstrated that Bakta outperforms other tools in terms of functional annotations, the assignment of functional categories and database cross-references, whilst providing comparable wall-clock runtimes. Bakta is implemented in Python 3 and runs on MacOS and Linux systems. It is freely available under a GPLv3 license at https://github.com/oschwengers/bakta. An accompanying web version is available at https://bakta.computational.bio.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialSoftwareDatabases, Nucleic AcidMetagenomeMetagenomicsbacteriagenome annotationmetagenome-assembled genomesplasmidswhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34739369
PMCPMC8743544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.