ArticleJAMA network open2021
Accuracy of Physician Estimates of Out-of-Pocket Costs for Medication Filling.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is There Any Difference in Preferences Between Patients and Physicians? Evidence From Anti-Hyperglycemic Medications Choices for Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of diabetes · 2026Article
- Prescription Real-Time Benefit Tools: Clinicians Receive Frequent Alerts Yet Rarely Accept The Suggested Changes.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2026Article
- Exploring the Lack of Transparency in Prescription Drug Costs: Contributors and Avenues for Reform.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Spending and Utilization for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps Therapies Among Commercially Insured Beneficiaries.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
- Comment on: Patient out-of-pocket costs for guideline-recommended treatments for erectile dysfunction: a medicare cost modeling analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Availability and Cost of Expensive and Common Generic Prescription Drugs: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacies.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Assessment of the utilization of real-time prescription benefits for patient cost savings within an outpatient setting.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Real-world use of a medication out-of-pocket cost estimator in primary care one year after Medicare regulation.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Article
- Improved Glaucoma Medication Access Through Pharmacy Partnership: A Single Institution Experience.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Association of patient copayment and medication adherence in systemic lupus erythematosus.Lupus science & medicine · 2023Article
- Out-of-Pocket Costs for Prostate Cancer Medications Substantially Vary by Medicare Part D Plan: An Online Tool Presents an Opportunity to Mitigate Financial Toxicity.Urology practice · 2023Article
- "It's just not easy to understand": A mixed methods study of health insurance literacy and insurance plan decision-making in cancer survivors.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Medication affordability discussions with older adults in primary care.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Where Do Real-Time Prescription Benefit Tools Fit in the Landscape of High US Prescription Medication Costs? A Narrative Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Review
- Informed Decision Making for Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023Article
- Deprescribing medications: Do out-of-pocket costs have a role?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- Physician Perspectives on Implementation of Real-Time Benefit Tools: A Qualitative Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Article
- Teaching of Cost-Effective Care in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Training: A Survey of Residency Programs in the US.JB & JS open accessReview
- Environmental Impact and Provider Satisfaction Associated with ePrescriptions in Otolaryngology: A Quality Improvement Study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-facialeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: One-third of US residents have trouble paying their medical bills. They often turn to their physicians for help navigating health costs and insurance coverage. Objective: To determine whether physicians can accurately estimate out-of-pocket expenses when they are given all of the necessary information about a drug's price and a patient's insurance plan. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national mail-in survey used a random sample of US physicians. The survey was sent to 900 outpatient physicians (300 each of primary care, gastroenterology, and rheumatology). Physicians were excluded if they were in training, worked primarily for the Veterans Administration or Indian Health Service, were retired, or reported 0% outpatient clinical effort. Analyses were performed from July to December 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: In a hypothetical vignette, a patient was prescribed a new drug costing $1000/month without insurance. A summary of her private insurance information was provided, including the plan's deductible, coinsurance rates, copays, and out-of-pocket maximum. Physicians were asked to estimate the drug's out-of-pocket cost at 4 time points between January and December, using the plan's 4 types of cost-sharing: (1) deductibles, (2) coinsurance, (3) copays, and (4) out-of-pocket maximums. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess differences in performance by specialty, adjusting for attitudes toward cost conversations, demographics, and clinical characteristics. Results: The response rate was 45% (405 of 900) and 371 respondents met inclusion criteria. Among the respondents included in this study, 59% (n = 220) identified as male, 23% (n = 84) as Asian, 3% (n = 12) as Black, 6% (n = 24) as Hispanic, and 58% (n = 216) as White; 30% (n = 112) were primary care physicians, 35% (n = 128) were gastroenterologists, and 35% (n = 131) were rheumatologists; and the mean (SD) age was 49 (10) years. Overall, 52% of physicians (n = 192) accurately estimated costs before the deductible was met, 62% (n = 228) accurately used coinsurance information, 61% (n = 224) accurately used copay information, and 57% (n = 210) accurately estimated costs once the out-of-pocket maximum was met. Only 21% (n = 78) of physicians answered all 4 questions correctly. Ability to estimate out-of-pocket costs was not associated with specialty, attitudes toward cost conversations, or clinic characteristics. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that many US physicians have difficulty estimating out-of-pocket costs, even when they have access to their patients' insurance plans. The mechanics involved in calculating real-time out-of-pocket costs are complex. These findings suggest that increased price transparency and simpler insurance cost-sharing mechanisms are needed to enable informed cost conversations at the point of prescribing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.