Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34738563›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2021

Medically assisted procreation in times of COVID-19: what impact on health care system organization and the reproductive rights of couples?

Giuseppe Rallo, Francesca Negro, Francesca Consalvo, Valeria Piersanti, Susanna Marinelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giuseppe RalloDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Medicolegal and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy. giuseppe.rallo@uniroma1.it.
Francesca NegroDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Medicolegal and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy. frannynegro@gmail.com.
Francesca ConsalvoDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Medicolegal and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy. francesca.consalvo@uniroma1.it.
Valeria PiersantiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Medicolegal and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy. valeria.piersanti@uniroma1.it.
Susanna MarinelliSchool of Law, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy. susanna.marinelli@tiscali.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe emergency caused by the spread of COVID-19 has overwhelmed health care facilities and required the reorganization of health systems in many nations worldwide. A year after its appearance, measures aimed at further containing disease transmission through massive vaccination campaigns. In pregnancy, vaccination should be administered with caution, in light of the lack of reliable data, since pregnant women have been excluded from experimentation. The pandemic has had a significant impact on assisted reproduction procedures in Italy. Methods: The authors have set out to analyze the measures issued by the Italian government in order to counter the spread of COVID-19, in addition to the national and international guidelines on assisted reproduction. DISCUSSION: The purpose of these documents is precautionary in nature: such measures are based on the principles of responsibility and solidarity, essential to stave off the saturation of health systems, curb contagion, but also to lay out a set of rules to starting a pregnancy while preserving the health of couples, operators and newborns. The authors also expound upon the rights claimed by couples seeking access to MAP (i.e. the right to become a parent, the couple's right to health, interest in demographic development). Conclusions: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a major impact on infertile couples. Since the pandemic broke out, Italy, like most European countries, has interrupted most ordinary activities of the centers operating in the field of assisted fertilization. We believe that access to assisted fertilization techniques by sterile and infertile couples should be part of the right to health rather than of the supposed right to become parents or the increase in the birth rate, also evoked as the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded. The current system of compensation and reimbursements needs to be reconfigured in order to prevent any form of discrimination.

Indexed as

COVID-19Reproductive RightsDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornItalyPandemicsPregnancyReproductionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34738563
PMCPMC8689323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.