ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
Optimization of spin-lock times in T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of Early Knee Osteoarthritis Using Multi-Component TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Early Knee Osteoarthritis Detection by Multi-Component TBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Highly Accelerated TNMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Utilizing 3D fast spin echo anatomical imaging to reduce the number of contrast preparations inMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Quadruple-refocused spin-locking: A robust method for high-amplitude TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- HSGDNet: Hybrid Synthetic-Data-Guided Deep Learning With NLS Refinement for Fast Multi-Component T1ρ Knee Mapping.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Simultaneous Bilateral TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Optimized MR pulse sequence for high-resolution brain 3D-T1ρ mapping with weighted spin-lock acquisitions.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Feasibility of a UTE Stack-of-Spirals Sequence for Biexponential TNMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Performance of MR learned pulse sequences for 3D bi-exponential, stretched-exponential, and mono-exponential TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Feasibility of 3D MRI fingerprinting for rapid knee cartilage TNMR in biomedicine · 2024Article
- Novel spin-lock time sampling strategies for improved reproducibility in quantitative T1ρ mapping.NMR in biomedicine · 2024Article
- Improved quantitative parameter estimation for prostate TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Optimizing variable flip angles in magnetization-prepared gradient-echo sequences for efficient 3D-T1ρ mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Updates on Compositional MRI Mapping of the Cartilage: Emerging Techniques and Applications.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Review
- 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting for rapid simultaneous T1, T2, and T1ρ volumetric mapping of human articular cartilage at 3 T.NMR in biomedicine · 2022Article
- Optimization of spin-lock times for TScientific reports · 2022Article
- Alternating Learning Approach for Variational Networks and Undersampling Pattern in Parallel MRI Applications.IEEE transactions on computational imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare different optimization approaches for choosing the spin-lock times (TSLs), in spin-lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (T
methodsOptimization criteria for TSLs based on Cramér-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) are compared with matched sampling-fitting (MSF) approaches for T
resultsAll optimized criteria were better than non-optimized ones. However, we observe that a modified CRLB and an MSF based on the mean of the normalized absolute error (MNAE) were more robust optimization approaches, performing well in all tested cases. The optimized TSLs obtained the best performance with synthetic data (3.5-8.0% error), model phantoms (1.5-2.8% error), and healthy volunteers (7.7-21.1% error), showing stable and improved quality results, comparing to non-optimized approaches (4.2-13.3% error on synthetic data, 2.1-6.2% error on model phantoms, 9.8-27.8% error on healthy volunteers).
conclusionA modified CRLB and the MSF based on MNAE are robust optimization approaches for choosing TSLs in T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.