Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34738164›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

The treatment of acute appendicitis in two age-based groups during COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective experience in a COVID-19 referral hospital.

Giorgio Lisi, Michela Campanelli, Maria Rosaria Mastrangeli, Domenico Spoletini, Rosa Menditto, Simona Grande, Massimiliano Boccuzzi, Michele Grande

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giorgio LisiDepartment of Surgery, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo 10, 00144, Rome, Italy. giolimas06@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3842-0815
Michela CampanelliEmergency Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Tor Vergata, viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Maria Rosaria MastrangeliDepartment of Surgery, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo 10, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Domenico SpoletiniDepartment of Surgery, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo 10, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Rosa MendittoDepartment of Surgery, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo 10, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Simona GrandeEmergency Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Tor Vergata, viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Massimiliano BoccuzziDepartment of Surgery, San Sebastiano Hospital, via Tuscolana 1, 00046, Frascati, Rome, Italy.
Michele GrandeEmergency Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Tor Vergata, viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
St. Eugenio Hospital · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDuring the past months, the Italian Government has reduced the restrictions and access to hospitals as well as outpatient. Since then, up to 40% of non-traumatic abdominal emergencies have had unusual delayed treatment. Given the rapidly evolving situation and the absence of evidence to support recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is useful to assess how the current situation is influencing the management of elderly patients with acute appendicitis.

methodsBetween February 2020 and December 2020, all patients 18 years or older undergone appendectomy were included. Patients were divided in two age-based groups (young groups, YG; elderly group, EG). Surgical approach, hospital stay, post-operative complications, radiology reports, and histologic examination were included in the retrospective analysis.

resultsOne hundred eight patients underwent appendectomy, 81 patients into the YG, and 27 in the EG. Laparoscopy was performed in 87.7% of the YG and in 51.8% of the elderly (p < 0.000), while conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 3.7% in the YG vs 22.3% of the other group (p < 0.009). Open procedures were more frequent in the EG, 25.9% vs 8.6% (p value < 0.05). No mortality rate was reported in both groups; moreover, the mean hospital stay was greater in the EG than the YG (p < 0.000).

conclusionOur data highlighted a partial delay in diagnosis in the elderly group, and an increase in complicated appendicitis also demonstrated by the need for conversion to laparotomy despite no significant relationship between these findings and the histologic examination was reported.

Indexed as

AppendicitisCOVID-19LaparoscopyAdultAgedAppendectomyHospitalsHumansLength of StayPandemicsPostoperative ComplicationsReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Acute appendicitisAppendectomyCOVID-19ElderlyLaparoscopySurgery

Identifiers

PMID34738164
PMCPMC8567973
OpenAlexW3210434656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.