ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2022
[Reconstruction of the extensor apparatus with advanced structural defects in knee revision arthroplasty].
Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Are free flaps a reliable solution to treat massive soft tissue defects in patients with knee periprosthetic joint infection? A systematic review and meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical impact of free dorsal interosseous flap combined with tendon graft on function recovery in one-stage reconstruction of composite dorsal wrist soft tissue defects.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Reconstruction of the Extensor Apparatus Using a Hybrid Augment with Polyethylene Mesh and Fascia Lata Allograft: Report of a Case with Patellar Gigant Cell Tumor of the Bone.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRestoration of the extensor apparatus in the case of advanced tendon defects as part of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Reconstruction and augmentation using vascularized gastrocnemius muscle and tendon. INDICATIONS: Advanced degeneration of the extensor apparatus (patella tendon; quadriceps tendon) with or without discontinuity, following revision arthroplasty. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Persistent infection or pending TKA revision. Damaged gastrocnemius or soleus muscle or Achilles tendon. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Extension of the surgical TKA-access medial-distally. Separation of the medial gastrocnemius muscle along the raphe and preparation of the distal tendon from the soleus portion. Transposition into the defect site, augmentation or reconstruction of the defect by double turn of the gastrocnemius tendon. The muscle belly serves to adequately cover the tendon as well as the ventral knee joint. Mesh coverage of the muscle. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Immobilization of the knee and ankle for 10 days until mesh graft healing. Stepwise increasing flection of the knee with 30°/60°/90° every 2 weeks. Total weight bearing with secured full extended knee, no weight bearing with flexed knee for 6 weeks.
resultsIn 9 patients, 3 with complete rupture of the patellar tendon, 5 with destruction of the extensor apparatus, and 1 patient with rupture of the quadriceps tendon following TKA revision, good functional results were achieved with active extension of the knee joint and standing/gait stability 6 months after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.