ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021
Cerebrovascular reactivity changes in acute concussion: a controlled cohort study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Data-Driven Normalization Framework for Subject-Specific Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment in Cerebrovascular Disease.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Cerebrovascular reactivity delay measured by blood oxygen level dependent magnetic resonance imaging and gas challenges: A systematic review.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Review
- Neurovascular Coupling in Acutely Concussed Adolescent Patients.Journal of neurotrauma · 2024Article
- Effects of Low-Level Blast on Neurovascular Health and Cerebral Blood Flow: Current Findings and Future Opportunities in Neuroimaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence suggests that cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) increases within the first week after the incidence of concussion, indicating a disruption of normal autoregulation. We sought to extend these findings by investigating the effects of acute concussion on the speed of CVR response and by visualizing global and regional impairments in individual patients with acute concussion.
methodsTwelve patients aged 18-40 years who experienced concussion less than a week before this prospective study were included. Twelve age and sex-matched healthy subjects constituted the control group. In all subjects, CVR was assessed using blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) echo-planar imaging with a 3.0T MRI scanner, in combination with changes in end-tidal partial pressure of CO
resultsAll studies were well tolerated without any serious adverse events. Anatomical MRI was normal in all study subjects. No differences in CO
conclusionsConcussion is associated with patient-specific abnormalities in BOLD cerebrovascular responsiveness that occur in the setting of normal global CVR. This study demonstrates that the measurement of CVR using BOLD MRI and precise CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.